I see no talk shows listed. The natural history programmes and Top gear aren't cheap to make.
top gear is very cheap to make.
I see no talk shows listed. The natural history programmes and Top gear aren't cheap to make.
top gear is very cheap to make.
No, it actually isn't.
how so? cars they get for free, tracks gets paid my car industry, the only thing that costs is wages and capital.
I'd rather gouge my ears out with blunt rusty spoons than listen to adverts on the wireless and you're suggesting that increased advertising would be a better thing?
Absolutely. Even then it's Sky+ and watched back fast-forwarding through the million advertisements.ITV is pure pleb TV. I can't remember the last thing I've watched on ITV that wasn't a film.
ITV is pure pleb TV. I can't remember the last thing I've watched on ITV that wasn't a film.
Absolutely. Even then it's Sky+ and watched back fast-forwarding through the million advertisements.
You on crack?You say that as if using Sky+ to record a program doesn't require a TV licence; it does.
So, people are happy to pay £60 A MONTH for five million **** cnannels with advertising (Sky etc) yet moan about £145 A YEAR for a license....
I see!
So, people are happy to pay £60 A MONTH for five million **** cnannels with advertising (Sky etc) yet moan about £145 A YEAR for a license....
I see!
do we know how much the bbc make a year with the license fee?