Miley's 9-year-old sister launching a lingerie line for kids

G-MAN2004 · 3 Feb 2010 at 23:04

****.

geekyEd · 3 Feb 2010 at 23:39

This is so wrong.

Andelusion · 3 Feb 2010 at 23:49

I'm just posting again to say LOL @ Mr Anderson's permabannage.

Nix · 3 Feb 2010 at 23:55

Andelusion said:
I'm just posting again to say LOL @ Mr Anderson's permabannage.

Inevitable, but what was the catalyst?

Also, who did the honours?

Viper² · 3 Feb 2010 at 23:57

Andelusion said:
I'm just posting again to say LOL @ Mr Anderson's permabannage.

Only 4 months overdue.

Angilion · 3 Feb 2010 at 23:59

semi-pro waster said:
That's just wrong on so many levels, why would anyone possibly think this was a good idea?

It's a good idea to the people who will make money from selling it.

Pre-pubescents do not need lingerie.

Hopefully it's just a dressing up thing for them. But it's icky anyway, because you're right. It's not like a costume - lingerie is deliberately sexual, that's what it's for.

Fuzz · 4 Feb 2010 at 00:04

Mr. Anderson said:
wow, you fail!

more miley please

Bit lost as to why you hosted them upside down??

LOL at the one you uploaded but didn't link to!!! You should be banned for that

EDIT OWNAGE. ***

Oh.. Looks like he has been banned then and I am late to the party again.

ViperZS · 4 Feb 2010 at 00:46

thats an absolute disgrace, no child should even have the CHOICE to dress like that!

EdGey · 4 Feb 2010 at 00:47

omg oO cant wait.

Greenlizard0 · 4 Feb 2010 at 01:48

They clearly aren't quite clued up on the sexuality of it all.

This weirdo bloke needs to spiderman them I think.

Darkst4r · 4 Feb 2010 at 01:49

Anyone else see the resemblance ?

steve-h · 4 Feb 2010 at 01:54

Don't care tbh... no 9 year old is buying their own underwear anyway, what's the problem?

Yet again the media twisted it to get you all outraged...

jp_bl_68 · 4 Feb 2010 at 01:56

steve-h said:
Don't care tbh... no 9 year old is buying their own underwear anyway, what's the problem?

What got twisted?

Darkst4r · 4 Feb 2010 at 01:57

steve-h said:
Don't care tbh... no 9 year old is buying their own underwear anyway, what's the problem?

Yet again the media twisted it to get you all outraged...

Slutty lingerie for 9 year olds ? If you can't see the wrong in that I think it's you that is twisted.

steve-h · 4 Feb 2010 at 02:00

Whether it's dressing like a dominatrix for Halloween, skipping around a pole-dancing pole or performing the totally un-PG hits 'Smack That' and 'Tik Tok', we suspect this nine-year-old could easily notch up more scandals than her big sis by the time she hits her teens.

Where does it mention slutty?

It says a 'lingerie line for kids'

jp_bl_68 · 4 Feb 2010 at 02:02

steve-h said:
Where does it mention slutty?

It says a 'lingerie line for kids'

Have you seen the pictures? Is any type of lingerie appropriate for 9 y/os? Is it appropriate for a 9 y/o to dress as a dominatrix?

Darkst4r · 4 Feb 2010 at 02:04

jp_bl_68 said:
Have you seen the pictures? Is any type of lingerie appropriate for 9 y/os? Is it appropriate for a 9 y/o to dress as a dominatrix?

This is what happens when the parents value money over their childrens integrity. Disgusting.

tundra · 4 Feb 2010 at 02:12

quite shocking idd

steve-h · 4 Feb 2010 at 02:16

jp_bl_68 said:
Have you seen the pictures? Is any type of lingerie appropriate for 9 y/os? Is it appropriate for a 9 y/o to dress as a dominatrix?

I must have missed them :confused:

Specially the dominatrix part... where is the picture of her dressed like that? :eek:

^TANK^ · 4 Feb 2010 at 02:20

steve-h said:
Where does it mention slutty?

It says a 'lingerie line for kids'

And what do people associate with lingerie then care bears and ice cream :rolleyes:

, come on man surely you can see how distasteful this is?