Yeehah! More 9/11 conspiracy . . .

growse said:
Repeating idiotic nonsensical sentences doesn't make them suddenly more true.

And if they get the same conclusion as the official current report, will we see yet another 'independant' review being called for?
Click to expand...


Look at both sides don't be negative :D

There are always 3 sides to every story.

The Right
The Wrong
The Truth.

Anyway Im back to F1 ;)
 
Okay I really don't care about these threads, but I do care when people can take such evidence as irrefutable fact.

Cyanide said:
They did? :confused:
Click to expand...

First pic, depth of field works wonders, there's many more pictures showing it's actual size. Even still, what the hell is it? A thinly,still painted twisted hunk.
Second and third pic have no reference, they could be anything.

Again, don't really care much if it was a plane or not but pictures on the internet shouldn't be taken as fact.
 
Not really, I'm still just seeing some photos with no tags and other photos with no source or again, as mentioned, no references? Just some pile of junk compared to other pile of junk but nothing to show where the photo was taken originally.

The only ones with the pentagon in the backdrop has unexplained items.

Sorry for not reading the entire convoluted page, but show me something that makes sense, one thing. Clear, precise.
 
I've given a site containing photos of the crash site, parts of the plane found there and the highjackers charred ID card, engineer reports, police reports, fire service reports, medical reports, eye witness accounts, flight box data.

I give up, there's no point me argueing this one anymore.

It was obviously a missile.
 
All I'm saying is, there could have been a crash that happened yesterday, those photo's could be from anywhere. Zoomed in, blurry/pixelated what looks like stock photo's of junk that could come from any accident you've never bothered to read up about in the last 50 or so years.

If I showed you a random picture now of plane wreckage and said "this is from the pentagon crash" and "this photo is of a REAL PLANE!", you'd believe me?

Yes? You'd be wrong because I'd post a fake one to call you out.
No? So why them not me?

I'm done though, it's obvious you can't go off topic with someone about the legitimacy of photos, crazies tend to disregard that fact. At least admit photo's can be doctored/made up/from anywhere before you get on your tinfoil hat crusade then maybe people would take you a little bit more seriously.

My take on it? Could be from the crash, could not be, I don't care and will never know unless I saw it happen myself.
 
Last edited:
ChrisJSY said:
At least admit photo's can be doctored/made up/from anywhere before you get on your tinfoil hat crusade then maybe people would take you a little bit more seriously.
Click to expand...

Yes, they can be... that's why I posted them with a link that lists reports to back them up.

One photo or video on it's own will never be any use. Neither will a witness statement or report. Combine the 2 and it because substantial evidence.

But you can't be arsed to read the evidence I presented so there's no point continuing with this.
 
Faking one photo is slightly different to faking various photos, various videos, plenty of eye witness statements, various reports, and perhaps more importantly making some Aeroplanes and their passengers disappear without a trace.

I was sceptical at first, but I've yet to see any concrete evidence to suggest that anything happened other then what they say happened. Any holes in their story are much more likely to be due to an attempt on their part to get rid of any blame then some conspiracy involving the mass murder of their own citizens.
 
deuse said:
Read the book.
Click to expand...

You haven't even read the book. Does the book contain any evidence or just quotes.


deuse said:
As I have already said the 9/11 commission have documentary proof of the FBI\CIA lies that's why there is going to be a new report.
Click to expand...

Even if true this is not surprising. It happens in ever case like this. Due to secrecy and embaresment certain ifnormation is withheld. This does not mena it is a conspiracy and it certainly doe snot mean everything is rubbish.

deuse said:
And Farmers book details the lies. And if he could not back up what he has said he would be in state pen by now.
And he is backed up by all on the 9/11 commission who done the report.
Click to expand...

How do you know, you have not read the book, so don't go liying again you get caught out like last time
.

Again where is this evidence everyone in the commission agrees with him and to what point. Again withholding certain information is expected and does not throw weight towards a conspiracy

deuse said:
It says about the evidence given to Nist by the FBI\CIA\Norad was wrong.
And don't forget WTC 7 was a FBI\CIA building all their records was kept there.
Click to expand...
You have not given this one second of though. It is a stupid argument. 98% of the nist report is based on Video and photographic evedince which is then used with computer modelling. Nothing FBI would say would change any of this portion of the reports.
again withholding information does not make all of the report useles.

It is funny though how you backed up the report and now one guy(with the backing of the whole group) comes out and says
"We of the 9/11 commission was lied to and we have proof the Report is Wrong" and you call them liars :confused:

deuse said:
Can't wait to see what you say when it's proven that Nist phyics data is wrong.
Click to expand...


Been waiting 6 years, how much longer do I have to wait?

It's clear you do not think, things through and just accept this stuff.
 
deuse said:
Read the book.


As I have already said the 9/11 commission have documentary proof of the FBI\CIA lies that's why there is going to be a new report.



And Farmers book details the lies. And if he could not back up what he has said he would be in state pen by now.
And he is backed up by all on the 9/11 commission who done the report.



It says about the evidence given to Nist by the FBI\CIA\Norad was wrong.
And don't forget WTC 7 was a FBI\CIA building all their records was kept there.

It is funny though how you backed up the report and now one guy(with the backing of the whole group) comes out and says
"We of the 9/11 commission was lied to and we have proof the Report is Wrong" and you call them liars :confused:

Can't wait to see what you say when it's proven that Nist phyics data is wrong.
Click to expand...
Meh, you're just one of those armchair know-it-alls who, without the anonymous Internet, wouldn't have any of these ridiculous "opinions", nor would you share them because you would be ostracized by your friends for being a nutter.

I don't see you going on protests, marches or doing any worthwhile campaigning other than spouting crap on a computer hardware forum.

Real conviction there.
 
AcidHell2 said:
Back to normal then and carrying on from the last thread, can't you remember how that turned out. Still no evidence or replys to questions.
Click to expand...

Omg do you know my X wife? she liked the last word as well :D
You have had all of the links and if you don't want to follow the inks inside and cross reference them then that's up to you.


Oh well..bye.....

PS your love calling people here names was you bullied at school?
 
Last edited:
It's pretty obvious to anyone who's bothered to read into the Pentagon incident that it wasn't a plane.

Total lack of proper wreckage / fire afterwards for starters.

Not to mention the 'problem' of an untrained pilot flying a jet liner less than 10 feet off the ground, whilst magically teleporting through the lamp posts which line the nearby freeway.

But yes, definitely Terrrrrists.
 
deuse said:
Omg do you know my X wife? she liked the last word as well :D
You have had all of the links and if you don't want to follow the inks inside and cross reference them then that's up to you.


Oh well..bye.....

PS your love calling people here names was you bullied at school?
Click to expand...

Ah, the last battle cry of the CT idiocy.

"I've given you a random smattering of unintelligble ramblings by random people on the internet who just want to seem popular and possibly make some money by being edgy, you go figure it out!".
 
Yamahahahahaha said:
It's pretty obvious to anyone who's bothered to read into the Pentagon incident that it wasn't a plane.

Total lack of proper wreckage / fire afterwards for starters.

Not to mention the 'problem' of an untrained pilot flying a jet liner less than 10 feet off the ground, whilst magically teleporting through the lamp posts which line the nearby freeway.

But yes, definitely Terrrrrists.
Click to expand...

so where did the plane go?
 
Yamahahahahaha said:
It's pretty obvious to anyone who's bothered to read into the Pentagon incident that it wasn't a plane.

Total lack of proper wreckage / fire afterwards for starters.

Not to mention the 'problem' of an untrained pilot flying a jet liner less than 10 feet off the ground, whilst magically teleporting through the lamp posts which line the nearby freeway.

But yes, definitely Terrrrrists.
Click to expand...
This is another prime example of foolish armchair campaigners (read: idiots) who jump into threads without reading anything.

Their lack of embarrassment for the fact that the comments they post have been disproved or challenged earlier is nothing short of laughable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom