I'd rather blow my own ballsack off and drive a clio than risk an Alfas reliability![]()
See, this is just plain ignorance. I don't mean that in an abusive way, but it is an uniformed opinion.
I'd rather blow my own ballsack off and drive a clio than risk an Alfas reliability![]()
There are many excellent FWD cars, I simply don't understand this blind assumption that RWD=great cars. There are hundreds, possibly thousands of RWD cars that utterly sucked. I guess you are too young to remember the Alfa Sud and Sprint, but they were probably the closest thing to an Integra at the time.
The you have classics like the mini (the proper one), and numerous hot hatches starting with e.g. Fiat Strada, and moving on to the Pug 205 GTi, and latterly the Focus RS etc. Do you think none of these are 'drivers' cars because they have FWD?
[TW]Fox;15982396 said:I guess to be fair my only Alfa experience to date was sullied by the fact it had a diesel engine. It just felt like any other rep car, only with a more plasticy interior and a 'stylish' look.
Lol - just found Clarksons review..![]()
It's Vauxhall's fault the 159 and Brara are heavy, they're both Vectra based.Supercar looks without the go.
SHOULD be a lot faster than it actually is imo.
Ok not supercar but you know what I mean.
The last great Alfa Driver's car in my books is the 155 Q4. Why does it have to be RWD to be a drivers car?This was my point in disguise, the amount of truly great drivers cars based on a FWD platform can be counted on one hand, Lotus Elan & the Integra come to mind, i can't think of a single Alfa that would make the list.
All the proper petrol head Alfas are in the past (8C excluded).
The hard plastic doesn't ever squeak though, the Italians have a hard time keeping soft plastic dashboard parts from touching other soft plastic parts then squeaking over every bump in the road.[TW]Fox;15982481 said:All that black stuff you see in that pic, that was like a Peugeot 206. It was rock hard and scratchy.
159 and Brara.....they're both Vectra based.