Grand jury indicts Dr. Earl Bradley in rapes of 103 child patients

Rest of life in prison would be the fairest - apparently, paedos get put to the top of the hit list in prisons :p He'd have an awful time :p
 
How is taking the life of a man who has done wrong? making you a better person then them?

holding toddlers upside down and yelling at them while committing sex acts; penetrating a girl's vagina with his hand when she was brought in for a sore throat. In one Dec. 13 recording -- made three days before his arrest, a 2- to 3-year-old girl was seen screaming and trying to run away from Bradley, police wrote

Please explain your reasoning, and it better be seriously good.

And it has absolutely nothing to do with making you a better person than them, it's about punishing that peice of ****ing dirt for doing absolutely disgraceful things.
 
Last edited:
But he doesn't deserve to be alive or be given the chance to live. Being alive is a gift.

Who are you or anyone else to take that gift away?

Killing a man because he's abused children?.. that's great "justice"... :rolleyes:

Barbaric attiude.
 
Who are you or anyone else to take that gift away?

Killing a man because he's abused children?.. that's great "justice"... :rolleyes:

Barbaric attiude.

Aw yeah, I understand now. Just let him go the little cutey. The world is an evil place, he treat all those kids with evil and he should be treat straight back with it.
 
How on earth did he do that to a girl who went in solely for a sore throat?! Are parents over there utterly dumb, or was she left alone (for some bizarre reason)? :confused:

Anyway, what a disgusting and extremely sick man. He'll get no rest at all in prison.
 
Aw yeah, I understand now. Just let him go the little cutey. The world is an evil place, he treat all those kids with evil and he should be treat straight back with it.

:confused:

Okay, whatever :)

I'm not saying that we should let him go, I'm saying that killing him is wrong, killing him because he's done wrong (abused children) is wrong. Who are you? or anyone else to decide to take this mans life? it's not Justice, it's revenge.

It's an awful and barbaric attitude.
 
:confused:

Okay, whatever :)

I'm not saying that we should let him go, I'm saying that killing him is wrong, killing him because he's done wrong (abused children) is wrong. Who are you? or anyone else to decide to take this mans life? it's not Justice, it's revenge.

It's an awful and barbaric attitude.
Who is he to decide to ruin 103+ lives?
 
:confused:

Okay, whatever :)

I'm not saying that we should let him go, I'm saying that killing him is wrong, killing him because he's done wrong (abused children) is wrong. Who are you? or anyone else to decide to take this mans life? it's not Justice, it's revenge.

It's an awful and barbaric attitude.

Who am I? I'm a human being with morals and a natural sense of right and wrong. Not a single penny should be spent feeding or detaining him, he should just be left in a desert. Atleast he will be some use there as vulture food.
 
Back
Top Bottom