Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 13,330
- Location
- The Orion Spur
eh?, "a human being with morals and a natural sense of right and wrong"
Yet you want someone dead?, yes that very moral of you
Grand jury indicts Dr. Earl Bradley in rapes of 103 child patients
- Thread starter trent
- Start date
eh?, "a human being with morals and a natural sense of right and wrong"
Yet you want someone dead?, yes that very moral of you
Wrong, he deserves WORSE than death, hacking an inch off of a limb every day untill he has 4 stumps remaining and then throwing him into a cage of starving wolves sounds more like it.
eh?, "a human being with morals and a natural sense of right and wrong"
Yet you want someone dead?, yes that very moral of you
Why are you failing to comprehend he raped 103 children?
Because your moral compass points to that being worse than taking anothers life no matter the cause. It's debatable and depends on personal viewpoints. That isn't saying I disagree with you (or agree, I'm fencesitting).
You have a really funny set of morals, as do many people in this thread.
However, I'm pleased this barbaric attitude isn't held by the government / justice system
Yet you want someone dead?, yes that very moral of you
So a police marksman who shots a hostage taker before he can take a life is immoral?
Last edited:
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
However in this case, he deserves everything bad. If my child had been abused by him, I'd want to cave his head in so much regardless of the time I'd get.
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 13,330
- Location
- The Orion Spur
Of course not, and that's a terrible tragedy but that doesn't mean that justifies wanting someone dead, we have to be better than that, you can;t way up the cost of imprisoning someone for life against better ethical judgement, it's pretty obvious that the way society is evolving that capital punishment is diminishing, if it was really an effective and ethical form of punishment then it would be growing in popularity rather than the latter.
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 11,742
- Location
- Northern Ireland
...and blind people can't find kids to fiddle with, so win win?
You have a really funny set of morals, as do many people in this thread.
However, I'm pleased this barbaric attitude isn't held by the government / justice system
Instead he will be locked in a room for the rest of his life without freedom where he will live in fear of getting killed and bullied everyday by the other inmates? Surely that is more barbaric.
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 13,330
- Location
- The Orion Spur
That's a grey area and you know it, but to be fair yes that is something I agree with if it's the onlyway to disable that person, but only while the crime is in action, what we are talking about here in the OP is after the fact, not during.
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 13,330
- Location
- The Orion Spur
So your whole rolleyes bs about wanting somnolence dead was what then?
Or are you in the same
camp?
eh? no, that is a completely different situation and you know it, stop trying to play games me, this isn't a chess game, what I agreed with is the best of a bad situation, the circumstances in the OP is different, and also I still wouldn't want the person dead in your scenario, rather disabled.
You specified no situation you said wanting someone dead is immoral hence you are immoral.
It's not chess it's hypocritical bull****
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 13,330
- Location
- The Orion Spur
You specified no situation you said wanting someone dead is immoral hence you are immoral.
It's not chess it's hypocritical bull****
In no situation should someone be 'sentenced' to death no, like I said, stop trying to play me.
This topic is about the circumstances pertaining to the story in the the original post, not 'the trolley theory'
Yet you want someone dead?, yes that very moral of you
My English must be failing me, I swear I can't see the word sentenced there.
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 13,330
- Location
- The Orion Spur
Yes he (the poster I was replying too) wants someone dead for the crimes committed in the article, in those circumstances I think it is very immoral, I wish death upon nobody, the scenario you brought up is completely different.
I'm sorry mate.
Killing this man in "justice" isn't barbaric?
Killing people (as a sentence for crimes committed) is wrong, morally, ethically whatever, It's wrong.
Two wrongs don't make a right, killing him won't solve or change anything.
I'm very pleased this country is ran by people who don't hold these values, it would be a much worse place if it were.
Killing this man in "justice" isn't barbaric?
Killing people (as a sentence for crimes committed) is wrong, morally, ethically whatever, It's wrong.
Two wrongs don't make a right, killing him won't solve or change anything.
I'm very pleased this country is ran by people who don't hold these values, it would be a much worse place if it were.
Se given the choice which would you choose?
Death or life in a cell in constant fear of brutality/murder?