Permabanned
- Joined
- 9 Jun 2009
- Posts
- 11,924
- Location
- London, McLaren or Radical
lol... you're not going to like this then...
Back when I had a CRT, I hated going below 85Hz because the flickering would give me a headache!
85Hz and I could spend hours on the computer... 60Hz and I was lucky to manage 30 mins!
I used to have to run at 1152xXXX instead of 1280x1024 because of that... lol...
Yeah... most 120Hz are marketted for the way they can display that 24fps image.
A 50Hz TV can't display a 24fps movie properly (with the exception of one or two higher end models I haven't seen, so can't comment on).
60Hz TVs suffer from what's known as 3:2 pull-down... you'll notice 60 doesn't divide by 24 by a complete integer (2.5)... so to cope, it would display a 24fps image in 2Hz per frame, then 3Hz, then 2Hz etc... meaning one frame will stay on screen 1.5x longer than the next... which is not as the director intended.
Some better TVs are able to compensate for this and properly adjust their refresh rate, but most aren't... so this can be very annoying!
120Hz TVs don't suffer from this problem because 120/24 = 5
However, most of this is academic anyway as on TVs, I've never been able to notice 3:2 pull-down...
But one of the tescos I was kitting out recently had a big entertainment section, with a 60Hz TV next to a 200Hz TV playing the olympics... the smoothness of the 200Hz TV was instantly indentifiable
And yes, this latter problem is a lot more prevelent in LCD TVs than plasmas... damn I miss my old Kuro!
But anyway, the whole argument above was about a computer monitor's refresh rate with an input frame rate that matched it
Back when I had a CRT, I hated going below 85Hz because the flickering would give me a headache!
85Hz and I could spend hours on the computer... 60Hz and I was lucky to manage 30 mins!
I used to have to run at 1152xXXX instead of 1280x1024 because of that... lol...
Yeah... most 120Hz are marketted for the way they can display that 24fps image.
A 50Hz TV can't display a 24fps movie properly (with the exception of one or two higher end models I haven't seen, so can't comment on).
60Hz TVs suffer from what's known as 3:2 pull-down... you'll notice 60 doesn't divide by 24 by a complete integer (2.5)... so to cope, it would display a 24fps image in 2Hz per frame, then 3Hz, then 2Hz etc... meaning one frame will stay on screen 1.5x longer than the next... which is not as the director intended.
Some better TVs are able to compensate for this and properly adjust their refresh rate, but most aren't... so this can be very annoying!
120Hz TVs don't suffer from this problem because 120/24 = 5
However, most of this is academic anyway as on TVs, I've never been able to notice 3:2 pull-down...
But one of the tescos I was kitting out recently had a big entertainment section, with a 60Hz TV next to a 200Hz TV playing the olympics... the smoothness of the 200Hz TV was instantly indentifiable
And yes, this latter problem is a lot more prevelent in LCD TVs than plasmas... damn I miss my old Kuro!
But anyway, the whole argument above was about a computer monitor's refresh rate with an input frame rate that matched it
