[TW]Fox;16150112 said:
You, yourself, don't drive an S Class for example....
Well, I don't do that commute any more - I changed jobs and relocated from beautiful Bristol to nasty Nottingham.
[TW]Fox;16150112 said:
he wants something 'cheap to run' and you are suggesting 7 year old S Class Mercs. In an ideal world it would be great to do your 25k in an S Class Merc but few people have the luxury of being afford that.
That's why I've given him the choice. If he's wants more luxo and is willing to risk the greater cost, its definitely worth considering especially given the intergalactic mileage that he's going to be doing. But as I said in my first post the best solution to this situation is actually the E60 525d/530d.
The BMW is going to be comparable / possibly slightly higher in cost compared to the humdrum metal
and its going to offer a better, more comfortable, solution. If the costs are slightly higher its not going to be so high as to make a material difference to his decision making and its going to be offset by the hassles that are going to be avoided.
If he spends £8k on say a Mondeo TDCi, puts 100k on it over the next 3 years, he going to incur all the hassles and costs of all the component problems associated with it. Clutch/DMF, injectors, EGRs, sensors, diesel pump, idle problems, trips to useless Ford dealers etc. That's not going to be cheap. Then he has to take a huge depreciation hit. You've had a Mondeo. How much is a 7 year old 150k Mondeo likely to be worth?
The BMW in comparison is engineered and built at a higher level. It's not as if its going to blow up half way down the motorway. As you've pointed out already, reliablity and having a working car is quite critical. And the depreciation curve on the E60 will be much less severe than the more common Mondeo. I think there will still be good demand for the E60 in 3 years time (helped by its sharp and modern looks) which is only going to help its residuals.
You throw all that into the mix, along with the greater build quality, engineering, comfort, reduced vibration and noise supression, and no way is it an easy choice of Mondeo/Vectra/Octavia etc. If it were me, I'd pick the BMW without even blinking.
If cost really is a major issue, he shouldn't be buying another car at all. He should just convert whatever he drives at the moment to LPG.
At the end of the day, there are different factors at play when choosing a car in these circumstances, and its not just about the car. I think one of the biggest factors has to be lifestyle impact. If his job is driving around delivering Littlewoods catalogues, then its Easy Life. No pressure to rush around because his employer won't want him breaking speed limits and driving is actually to be a break from whatever works he's does during the non-driving time. But he's said the 25k is commuting, so that means, he's going to have be doing the driving
on top of his normal work. If he's got a stressful job, the last thing he'll want to be going home in is a noisy Octavia PD130. He really wants to be making the commuting as painless as possible. But at the end of the day, everyone's personal circumstances and lifestyle factors are different. When I was doing my hideous commute, there were times when I was jammed up and going nowhere on the NCR and thinking, "I'm getting really fed up of all this driving", "I really could do with an automatic...", "Hmmm...why didn't they double glaze the windows", "Hmmm....having some of the armchairs from the Saab 9-3 would probably be more comfortale that these seats." For me (and the circumstances that existed for me back then), its a no brainer.