To be honest, I'd be willing to bet that 4/5 drivers of any car make or model that isn't specifically a 4x4 would guess that their car was FWD or just wouldn't know.
I know people that don't know their car moves because there's something driving the wheels. And one person who thought the exhaust made it move.
is that the case? Is it genuinely a bad idea on a small car? I always thought the principal was quite good, maybe just poor implementation?
Front wheel drive has certain advantages, which suit a hatchback.
-Packaging, front transverse front wheel drive takes up very little space, the 1 series has a diff in the boot.
-Weight, prop shafts are big metal things.
-Safety, in the hands of an idiot (80% of 1 series drivers) FWD is safer.
There's only one real advantage to RWD; performance, and only 20% of 1 series owners have the 1st bit of knowledge required to use it.
You all know it's true.
I wouldn't say it's a bad implementation of RWD, I actually sort of like the 1 series, it's interesting, just a terrible idea.
Not unsuitable at all really, cheaper to produce than designing a whole new drivetrain and engine layout and gives them the marketing 'edge'
A marketing edge that only 20% of their customers even knew about.
Do BMW have no good FWD floors? Mini would mean they can't use the in-line 6 motors, but how many 1 series have an in-line 4, and how many have a diesel? Aren't they supposedly licensing the short Panda floor for the Isetta?