Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Nov 2002
- Posts
- 16,379
- Location
- 38.744281°N 104.846806°W
wrong thread
Last edited:
Just plain not true. Do really know so little about this country, or are you forgetting we have a Chancellor, who looks after the country's finances. Gordon Brown was this Chancellor for a decade year.Gordon Brown hasn't done anything to the economy, it was all set in motion by Blair (in this country at least).
In relation to their long-term average, British house prices soared by 88.5% between 1997 and 2007, according to the OECD. In the U.S. the rise was 64.5%. Britain's household debt rose to 176.9% of disposable income in 2007 from 104.8% in 1997. During the same period, U.S. household debt rose only to 105.8% of disposable income from 64.3% in 1997. The increases in Germany and France were considerably lower.
Gordon Brown tolerated and even encouraged the formation of these bubbles for several reasons. The traditional sources of Britain's economic strength, the mining and manufacturing industries, shrank during his term as chancellor. Total mining sector output, including oil and natural gas, dropped by 31% between 2000 and 2007. Total manufacturing production was stagnant during this period.
Eager to achieve the illusion of steady progress in the overall economy, Mr. Brown needed the rapid expansion of financial services, and the real estate and business services industries. Their output soared by 48% and 33% respectively from 2000 to 2007, compared with 19% for the overall economy. Their combined employment level reached nearly 6.7 million in 2007, an increase of more than one million.
Ignoring the inability of many house buyers to pay their mortgages, he touted this message to City bankers in successive annual speeches at the Mansion House in London, promising them "light-touch regulation."
The group added that Mr Brown had failed to heed signs of a slowdown, and could not blame external factors such as rising oil prices for the problem.
“The chancellor is blaming the UK economic slowdown on the recent spike in oil prices and the weakness of the European economy, but this is unrealistic,” the Item Club’s chief economic adviser Professor Peter Spencer said.
“The simple fact is that he’d already run out of money this time last year,” Prof Spencer told BBC Radio Five Live.
“These developments show just how flimsy the current budgetary framework is. Reform of the fiscal rules is long overdue.”
In 2006, it was estimated that Brown’s pension stealth tax (the “pensions raid”) cost retirement funds upwards of £100 billion - approximately £100,000 retirement capital for every average pension saver (Telegraph, BBC).
The report stresses to the Chancellor Brown that the removal would have dire consequences for pension funds, pensioners and the equities market by 2004. This is exactly what happened.
On March 17, 1998, the FTSE-100 index closed at 5834 points. On close on the 10th Febuary 2010, it was down 12%.Ah, says Mr Brown, this is a global crisis. All industrialised countries have been affected by recession. In which case, what has happened to their stock markets?
- In France, the CAC index is down less than 1%
- In Germany, the DAX is up 12%
- In America, the DOW is up 15%
- In Hong Kong, the HANG SENG is up 77%
Sorry, missed that thenYeah... Hatter... I had already admitted that I was wrong...
Labour - incompetent idiots
Conservatives - care about little more than lining their pockets. Two more words. Milk snatcher.
Lib Dems - haven't really given any solid policies. Liars.
Greens - care about the people, the planet and scientific advancement but their stand on animal rights may get in the way of this.
Legalise Cannabis Party - one hit wonder.
Monster Raving Looney Party - can't be any worse than the others tbh
BNP - hey, you know what was good? The 18th Century.
Not if Lib Dem and Labour form a coalition - it'd be the worst of both parties (but fortunately very unlikely). Lib Dem and Conservative would being out the best in bothVote lib for a hung parliament. That way we will get the best of all parties. Hopefully.
Labour - incompetent idiots
Conservatives - care about little more than lining their pockets. Two more words. Milk snatcher.
Lib Dems - haven't really given any solid policies. Liars.
Greens - care about the people, the planet and scientific advancement but their stand on animal rights may get in the way of this.
Legalise Cannabis Party - one hit wonder.
Monster Raving Looney Party - can't be any worse than the others tbh
BNP - hey, you know what was good? The 18th Century.
Its because the rich people, pay for almost everything in the country.
No. The top 1% of earners pay for 25% of the entire tax pool derived from income.And here was me thinking poor people paid for almost everything...
Sarcasm is lost on some.No. The top 1% of earners pay for 25% of the entire tax pool derived from income.
No. The top 1% of earners pay for 25% of the entire tax pool derived from income.
That... just can't be right.If i'm right the poorest 10% also pay around 25% of the nations taxes and they are taxed by a much higher proportion of there income than the richest 1%.
If i'm right the poorest 10% also pay around 25% of the nations taxes and they are taxed by a much higher proportion of there income than the richest 1%.
Indeed, it isn't fiscally possible except if the Brown had introduced taxes that only the poorest 10% paid!That... just can't be right.