YES, THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT I SAID!
Let me get this straight, you'd prefer that citizens of our country as well as many others lost their lives rather than those who'd signed up and are willing to do so if it means protecting those back home and those in Afghanistan both from the terrorist organisations and from joining said organisations?
I hope you realize our current actions in Afghanistan and Iraq are fuelling terrorist motives, instead of doing the opposite?
You're lapping up the official line on the wars like a thirsty dog - on a thread with a completely different topic to boot. Fool on you mate.
I hope you realize our current actions in Afghanistan and Iraq are fuelling terrorist motives, instead of doing the opposite?
Cool, none of which affected the UK, whereas our first bombing by Islamic Terrorists was in 2005, directly attributed to the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq...
A few, most are just small candles placed in glass jars so that they don't go out.
I guess the 67 British victims of 9/11 didn't effect the UK? Go find the rock you came from under.
Oh i'm sorry, upset you? (if one of the dead was someone you know then really sorry).
That was still aimed at America, the Brits died due to there being in the building, they weren't aimed at purpously. That's a bit like saying any foreign people that died in 2005 were targeted specifically.
67 Dead due to essentially bad luck does not mean we invade another country and kill tens of thousands...
And here's me thinking this thread was about the polish presidents death......