let them take you to court - thats too expensive and I doubt a court will make you pay that much for sliding in the snow! (although it is a risk!)
let them take you to court - thats too expensive and I doubt a court will make you pay that much for sliding in the snow! (although it is a risk!)
Why not?
There is absolutely no reason why you "must" slide around and crash in the snow.
Some conservative driving and the incident would never have happened.
Can't blame the weather for bad driving.
I disagree. Cost is disproportionate to the damage done, which wasn't deliberate or malicious.
Most people don't intend on damaging another person's car.
So if you do crash - your insurance shouldn't pay out as what you did was an accident and not actually intended?
Why not?
There is absolutely no reason why you "must" slide around and crash in the snow.
Some conservative driving and the incident would never have happened.
Can't blame the weather for bad driving.
That's a different story, as that's somebodies personal property. Whereas this is council and they have funds to maintain and replace, so £700 is extortionate in my opinion.
How do you know he wasn't driving conservatively?