Poll: ****Official Battlefield Bad Company 2 Thread*****

Which type of game play would you prefer

  • Normal Rush Mode

    Votes: 481 33.4%

  • Hardcore Rush Mode

    Votes: 222 15.4%

  • Normal Conquest

    Votes: 507 35.2%

  • Hardcore Conquest

    Votes: 229 15.9%
  • Total voters
    1,439
AN-94 is just daft now, loved it before, was far better than the m16.

Did three rounds of ~25:5, and I haven't played for a week! Think it'll be my next platinum.
 
It auto-kicks for ANY tk? Thats a bit stupid. Seriously the number of times i've killed an ally with an AT mine is ridiculous, i'm not even sure how they managed it!
 
Evilsod said:
It auto-kicks for ANY tk? Thats a bit stupid. Seriously the number of times i've killed an ally with an AT mine is ridiculous, i'm not even sure how they managed it!
Click to expand...

Lol I've wondered that before as they don't explode on team mates... I think it's explosives going off near them making them explode killing friendlies nearby :p In my opinion, ideally it should really count for the person setting them off though in this case
 
Lame game on SAS again today, too many snipers again and the teams were unbalanced 2:1 for ages on a map. The teams only balanced out after the opposing team had taken every point and set up a nice roadblock just outside our uncappable.

Dunno, seems like this patch has also encouraged lame play.
 
Is anyone else finding smaller games preferable to the big 32 man battles? I find 16 or so players is a lot more....... better??? 32 man just seems to be picking off people from long range most of the time, and when too far forward, being killed by someone from the side whereas 16 man seems a lot more involved... A lot of movement, outthinking the enemy to flank them and loaaaddds of knifing :p... Like at least 4 or so dog tags a match... I've got 14 in a game before :p
 
Streeteh said:
I do sometimes get the feeling the maps were optimised for the 24 player server limit on consoles....
Click to expand...

Arica Harbour on Conquest is 1 of the worst maps i've ever played. No tanks and tons of buildings so at least half of deaths were (are still?) caused by Gustavs or Noob Tubes just spammed at buildings. Theres simply no space on it to flank anyone and the team who starts at the top of the hill are at such a ridiculous disadvantage.
 
I've been knifed twice by Midnight :(

I remember those... 1 of them was fair game but the other 1 he ****ing teleported 5 metres and stabbed me!
 
ordinaryjoe said:
Wow... As a sniper, you can arm an M Com and defend it on your own while your team can't get into the enemy base?

That's impressive...
Click to expand...

u do know a sniper could take any type of shotgun, a tommy gun or an m1 garand dont u?! Some people like to go lone wolf or get fed up waiting for their team of (sniper) campers to rush the mcom!!
 
creed said:
u do know a sniper could take any type of shotgun, a tommy gun or an m1 garand dont u?! Some people like to go lone wolf or get fed up waiting for their team of (sniper) campers to rush the mcom!!
Click to expand...

Had that just now on the server, team of 4, 3 of which were snipers, killed the server :(
 
ordinaryjoe said:
Is anyone else finding smaller games preferable to the big 32 man battles? I find 16 or so players is a lot more....... better??? 32 man just seems to be picking off people from long range most of the time, and when too far forward, being killed by someone from the side whereas 16 man seems a lot more involved... A lot of movement, outthinking the enemy to flank them and loaaaddds of knifing :p... Like at least 4 or so dog tags a match... I've got 14 in a game before :p
Click to expand...
nah 32 man for me more action :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom