Just curious here, wondering why people who don't support BNP accuse people that do support BNP of being racist?
IIRC the aim is to keep Britain British, I don't see anywhere a mention of keeping Britain White. There is no mention of this, people from how I see it are fast to attack that the BNP is racist but they put the words into the peoples mouth that they said it needs to be White - they do not mention this?
Do they not state that anyone with a British passport is considered british and anyone without one is not British? Where does the colour factor come into it?
I think they mentioned something about reviewing British passports given since 1998 or something like that, so see if they have 'earned' that passport - whats wrong with this?
Surely this method is a good way of getting rid of those who dont put into the system?
I'm just curious on the topic and would like to see peoples responses without discussing 'because your indian etc' There are Indians with british passports right? So what argument is there against the bnp if they do not mention colour?
I'm not for them by the way, just looking at the arguments that often discussed over this but don't really see any facts when bnp are accused of being racist pulled up, apart from assumption.