• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

480 SLI the value choice?

Associate
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Posts
306
Location
St Albans, UK
The Metro 2033 scores skew things a bit. But this should still be good enough to cause today's anti 480 lolz.
 
so £620 at minimum vs £890 at minimum, all depends on whether that extra 6-40 fps is worth £270 lol

although i guess if you have money to burn why not eh?
 
Not that surprising given US pricing which uses a difference between cheapest SLi/Xfire configurations of $220 (~50% of the 5870). In the UK where the difference in pricing is £260 (~80% of the 5870) the conclusions are probably not valid. Cost of additional equipment, esp wrt power and cooling, also negatively impact the equation for the 480.
 
So to get the better bang for buck in regards price per FPS, it's going to cost you an additional £270, that makes total sense^^
Better factor in that price that you'll also need a better power supply as well, so is it still better price per fps?
 
It uses the US price of the 480s which is a lot cheaper than the price here when compared to the difference between the US price and one here for the 5870.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
I'm not sure if the word value can be used at all to describe the current graphics card market. There's good 'bang for buck', but the only setup that really might fall under that category at the moment is 5770CF.

480 scaling is impressive, if you can get two, and if you have the cash to outlay in the first place.
 
Okay take out the metro 2033 silliness in this test and you only get 16.5 fps extra (not 19.71fps) also using MW2 in dx9 ruins the testing of dx11 cards a little bit.

480
81.33 + 68.35 + 40.63 +181.64 + 105.06 / 5 = 95.4 fps

5870
69.1 + 62.35 +33.69 + 146.2 + 83.2 / 5 = 78.9 fps

What do you think? I think that looking at the results in the review doesn't really show the true story about the 5870 vs 480 xfire/sli battle.
 
Toms are obviously inept when it comes to proper benchmarking, I mean half the games are not even working on the xfire setup whilst they are fine in other reviews at same rez and with AA. Check Techpowerup out for none bias benchmarking, they came to the conclusion..


This solution is particularly suited for resolutions beyond 1920 x 1200, more towards 30" displays with 2560 x 1600 pixels resolution. On lower resolutions, it tends to not offer much of an advantage over having the single card, or other competing single-card solutions such as the ATI Radeon HD 5970. The HD 5970 is the strongest contender, since it ends up being just 13% slower, with less than half the energy footprint. This is what makes performance figures of GTX 480 SLI less than impressive as a solution. With multi-GPU scaling, as expected, GTX 480 scales better with increase in resolutions over the single GTX 480. However, compared to Radeon HD 5870 in its 2-card CrossFire setup, the scaling is a little worse (overall 41% for GTX 480 SLI vs. 43% for HD 5870 CrossFire), an area that needs attention from NVIDIA.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_480_SLI/31.html

So go with whichever sites you trust, inept ones like Toms or ones like techpowerup who do honest reviews where they can get crysis working at max rez on 5870 xfire, something Toms is seemingly incapable of.

4444v.jpg



I will say that if you game at max rez then 480 SLI is the better choice ' heat and ridiculous power draw and all ' because of the extra Vram they have, something which is undoubtedly killing the performance on 1GB cards, anything under that rez and xfire is the way to go.
 
Wow, a single 480 is faster than a 5970 in metro 2033, incredible!
Seems in most games, a GTS 250 or 4870 will still be ok. But then, where's the fun in just ok ;)
 
Wow, a single 480 is faster than a 5970 in metro 2033, incredible!
Seems in most games, a GTS 250 or 4870 will still be ok. But then, where's the fun in just ok ;)

THe problem being that Metro is a tech demo/launch Nvidia title/programmed to make AMD look as bad as possible.

If it was a half decent game and Tess/DOF improved IQ that would be one thing, but its an incredibly generic, and short game(though very pretty without tess/dof) but the two major features that differentiate performance between the two brands of cards, are IQ sucking, performance killing awful attempts at killing performance.

You'd be completely barmy owning 4x480gtx's or 2x5970's to enable DOF, at all, it just reduces IQ horribly, is completely unreleastic and offers no benefit, except sucking less badly on Nvidia hardware, but thats what it seems to have been added for. I would actually enable tesselation on both those setups because why not, will still run plenty fast on either. However on a single 480gtx/5870 I wouldn't enable tesselation on EITHER because the performance drop for IQ you really won't spot without pausing, screen shotting and zooming in, isn't worth the drop on the Nvidia or AMD cards.



Unfortunately, also Tom's results, as shown, don't tie in with other sites, even then when using incorrect and dodgey Metro and Crysis results, which other sites have managed to get those settings to work without issue, the 480gtx beats it incredibly marginally, at a specific resolution with specific prices.

Use UK prices, and the 480gtx value goes out the window, use proper results for that resolution in the two flawed games, and the value goes out the window, use a resolution more people would use(1920x1200 is still 10,000 more popular than 2560x1600) and value goes out the window.

But yes in that very unique situation, with broken settings causing bad results on AMD for no reason, the 480gtx becomes slightly less horrifically useless, though you're still required to pay through the teeth to get said "value" .
 
The vagueries of non-like-for-like, CPU-limited and occasionally VRAM-limited scaling results don't interest me, but this bit does:

"I knew this 800W 80 PLUS Gold unit would be fine for a pair of GeForce GTX 480s, but I was unsure if it'd handle a trio. Despite power numbers that crested 900W from the wall, it did its job well, and never exhibited stability issues, even in the packed HAF 932 enclosure."

That's an 800w PSU handling TRI-SLI 480s! Bang goes (heh) the "you'll need a new power supply" argument, I guess. Reviews say the Corsair TX850w I've got maintains nigh-on 90% efficiency at 100% load, it could run two overclocked 480s with ease. I already knew it could take it, this just confirms to me that it wouldn't even be stressed.

The chances of me making an insane impulse splurge have just increased.
 
Back
Top Bottom