Does God cause suffering??

that was why it was an analogy...

the morals of greed, lust etc are all such tools that can empower an individual over another. god gave us these, as i have stated knowing full well the consequences...

he also divided the planet along a lot of religious lines.

Why didnt he just appear to everyone globally at the same time and say: THESE ARE MY RULES.

instead of watching idly and allowing all those people before jesus' time to simply die without even knowing their was a single god, or before pitting, say, jews vs christians vs muslims in an all out holy war?

its immoral and it makes no sense.
 
Argue both sides and you get an A. I got an A in that exam at school and knew absolutely sweet nothing about it, it's more structure than anything else with R.E.
 
Whatever you do; when finishing your essay make sure that you make sure that you have covered the relevant points and given it a good structure. Then, at the very end make sure you ask a question that is relevant to what you have written up and the original question. Religious people love a good question to answer a question.

I used to do this in RS all the time and it was a sure fire way of getting a good grade.
 
Actually, I don't. All I have to ask myself is "Does God cause suffering?" and the answer is, unequivocally, yes. As I am agnostic I do not have to justify Gods actions in any way, shape or form.

But you evidently believe in God as you just said He causes suffering. Agnostic professes that it is not possible to prove the existence of a ‘first cause’ or a god.


So it is OK to murder babies to do that?

Erm, no it is not ok but if you read the bible you can see that God more than warns people to change their ways – some do some don’t but it is the people who have brought it upon themselves and their households.
As for babies, they obviously had no choice whatsoever so there is an age of accountability where someone can know right from wrong, sin basically, obviously young children and babies come into that category. Also someone would probably want to bring up mentally disabled people as not having the opportunity to know right from wrong, they would fall into that category.


But murdering babies is OK if God does it. See above. We also have to assume that every single person deserves death. Which seems a bit of a stretch.

Of course it's a stretch because you're a fence sitter and don't know what you believe because your agnostic - no offence but how can you possibly argue this topic without either believing in God (in whatever form you choose) or are an atheist?
Fact is Jesus will judge each and every one of us to see, 1) whether our names are written in the Lamb’s Book of Life…… i.e. born again, 2) according to our works for those whose names are in there.


Does that mean gay sex is back on? It seems leveticus is always trotted out when arguing against it. And I am not arguing religion, I am just answering the question "Does God cause suffering?". He may well do it from a well meaning or justified stance, but the evidence is that he causes suffering.

Whatever does it for you mate, I prefer my wife thanks.
Read my first comments. If I shoot you in the face that has nothing to do with God, I held the gun and pulled the trigger, my choice and free will decision, you die or are seriously wounded and I suffer punishment from the government and if I haven’t repented (truly) to God then I will go to hell.


To be honest my main problem with your version of God is that he set the whole system up to be against me. He knows fully well that due to upbringing and mental makeup (things completely outside of my control) I am unable to accept God without proof. He is also not going to provide such proof. So therefore according to the rules he set in place I am damned. Forgive me if I do not seem enamoured with such a diety.

LOL, does make me laugh that comment – it isn’t MY version.
You obviously think God setup the system to be against you as you don’t understand it, I suggest you read John with an open mind.
Actually mate we are all born into many different family situations. Differing ethic, moral and class systems which is why you can read the life of Jesus and the disciples were reaching out to everyone that wanted to hear, Jew, gentile, black, white or whatever.

Why would God want to prove He exists when He has done that and more already? Jesus, creation, biblical history – oh but wait, you don’t really believe much of those or choose to sit on the fence so that proof isn’t good enough.

Truth is at the turn of the Old/New Testament there were people waiting for the much prophesied Messiah (Jesus). Things like where He would be born, what He would say, do and ultimately the Cross that He would hang from, all for our sins were in the Jewish scriptures. Thing is some of the people who were waiting for this and actually met Jesus, spoke to Him and saw His miracles still chose not to believe – they saw THE Son of God and that wasn’t enough.

Christianity is about faith, the bible states that if we truly seek then God will give us the faith to believe, by grace.

Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
Eph 2:9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.
 
Why would God want to prove He exists when He has done that and more already? Jesus, creation, biblical history – oh but wait, you don’t really believe much of those or choose to sit on the fence so that proof isn’t good enough.

We have very different definitions of proof. I just hope if I'm ever in court, you aren't a juror.
 
Hmm so let's picture a situation.

I kidnap you off the streets and proclaim that God doesn't exist and that to prove it I tie you up and poke you with a pointy stick every 10 seconds and in order for me to stop either god has to stop me or you admit that God may not be real - otherwise you will die via epic poking. Oh and by stick I don't mean some kind of innuendo ¬_¬.

Basically your life would be in my hands, I would be your god, no? There would be no god controlling my actions, I could play good cop bad cop all night long.

What would be the outcome?

I know it certainly wouldn't be one of the 3 ;)
 
Other than all the bits of suffering that are directly attributed to God or which mankind has zero involvement in?

You assume that God either exists and is directly responsible or God doesn't exist and is not directly responsible. What if he does exist, and just doesn't care? or what if with the gift of freewill, we are expected to stand or fall on our own merit.

Suffering in all its forms is entirely subjective, we have the freewill to end our own suffering at any time, one way or another. Some people thrive on suffering, their own and/or that of others.

well knowing how that would impact the majority and allow people to take advantage of other people, ultimately the decision to allow free will was gods and KNOWING what would happen, he is responsible?

its like me creating a person, selling them a gun i know they will use to kill someone,

then am i not in some way responsible? given that i, a created that person, gave him the tools to sin?


Why would he be responsible?, he gave you the freewill to take the responsiblity yourself. that is the point of freewill, without it you have no choice, with it you accept the consequences for your own actions.

You create a Person and give them Freewill, they then create a Gun, which they then use to kill someone else. You are only responsible for creating the person, the person through their own freewill created the Gun and the desicion to use it in such a way. If you were held responsible, then the person would negate their use of freewill as you would already knew the outcome of your actions. There was no freewill on the part of the person you created.

So are we predetermined or not would be the question, not of Gods responsibilty as that would depend entirely on the outcome of the first question.
 
Why would God want to prove He exists when He has done that and more already? Jesus, creation, biblical history – oh but wait, you don’t really believe much of those or choose to sit on the fence so that proof isn’t good enough.

none of that is true though. its not proof purely because it is written in a book...which was created from many stories that had been handed down for generations to generations before that.

like i said, if there was a god, why didnt he just appear to everyone at the same time show some stuff...NOT SEND a 'MESSENGER' who could have simply been a do-gooder or been one of those people who claim to have spoken to god etc...

god should have known how unbelievable it was then, how unbelievable it was to all of the civilisations for the previous thousands of years and how it would be now...otherwise he isnt god.

also, go back one step...if god had not created anything - would there be suffering? no...so infact the act of god creating things actually stimulated the opportunity for their to be suffering...so if you do believe in god then you must believe that he takes a lot of the responsibility for it...

if he had created a world devoid of life, no-one would have suffered.
 
Why would he be responsible?, he gave you the freewill to take the responsiblity yourself. that is the point of freewill, without it you have no choice, with it you accept the consequences for your own actions.

no no no... because god KNOWS what we will do with free will...he already KNOWS the outcome before he acts. therefore by creating man, he knows he will create suffering...so going back logically in this chain - why did god create man if he did not want any suffering?

why was it necessary to create souls, then to test them and then for them to accompany god in heaven?

why not just create good souls and put them into heaven and cut to the chase? why even create the souls in the first place? it makes no sense!!

do you know how many souls have been created since the beginning of mankind? what does god need with all these souls?! again it makes no sense.
 
the morals of greed, lust etc are all such tools that can empower an individual over another. god gave us these, as i have stated knowing full well the consequences...

Where does it say that in the bible?
You are much mistaken I’m afraid Nick, God did not give us these. Through the fall (Adam and Eve eating the fruit in the Garden of Eden etc), sin caused this to be part of our lives, it was a free choice. The fruit was from the 'tree of the knowledge of good and evil' so yes God created the tree but God Himself has that knowledge but does not use it for evil - Adam and Eve gained this knowledge but it corrupted them and they became imperfect.


He also divided the planet along a lot of religious lines.

Did He? How do you come up with that?
He divided mankind at the Tower of Babel in as much as giving different languages.


Why didnt he just appear to everyone globally at the same time and say: THESE ARE MY RULES.

Instead of watching idly and allowing all those people before jesus' time to simply die without even knowing their was a single god, or before pitting, say, jews vs christians vs muslims in an all out holy war?

its immoral and it makes no sense.

Yea, that worked didn’t it – 10 Commandments etc. People turn around and do whatever the heck we want.

People were more than capable of having a relationship with God under the law (prior to Jesus dying on the cross), it was impossible to fulfil the whole law but clearly there were many that would have gone to Paradise as you have two references in the bible that back that up:-
1) The account (not story or parable) of the Rich Man and Lazarus – the Rich Man could see Lazarus in Paradise. (Luke 16v20)
2) Jesus telling the repentant thief on the cross, ‘today you shall be with me in Paradise’. (Luke 23v43)

God didn’t pit Jew vs. Christians vs. Muslim in a holy war, the people chose to do this in the name of religion.


Back in the day (showing my age!) was it the owners or managers fault if Millwall or Chelsea fans used to knock 10 bells out of each other? They wore the club shirt and went to the matches but there was only so much you could do to get the fans to behave, not doing so and you get banned.

Crude example but you get what I mean hopefully.
 
no no no... because god KNOWS what we will do with free will...he already KNOWS the outcome before he acts. therefore by creating man, he knows he will create suffering...so going back logically in this chain - why did god create man if he did not want any suffering?

why was it necessary to create souls, then to test them and then for them to accompany god in heaven?

why not just create good souls and put them into heaven and cut to the chase? why even create the souls in the first place? it makes no sense!!

do you know how many souls have been created since the beginning of mankind? what does god need with all these souls?! again it makes no sense.


The problem with this type of discussion is that we with finite minds are trying to understand an infinite God - ok you may say that is an excuse but then I suppose by the same argument so is yours.

Why not create use that we did not have free will......... then we would be robots. God created us so we could have a relationship with Him, not be programmed to do so.

You keep saying it doesn't make sense but of course it doesn't for the above reasons as that you don't believe God did what He did for those reasons.

Faith has to come into it somewhere and then as you go on the proof becomes more undeniable.
Unfortunately someone who doesn't want to believe it is like a man having never opened his eyes all his life trying to tell someone who can see that red is actually blue when it isn't. It's not the blind mans fault but needs to open his eyes.

Sorry, my examples suck but you get the idea.
 
Where does it say that in the bible?
You are much mistaken I’m afraid Nick, God did not give us these. Through the fall (Adam and Eve eating the fruit in the Garden of Eden etc), sin caused this to be part of our lives, it was a free choice. The fruit was from the 'tree of the knowledge of good and evil' so yes God created the tree but God Himself has that knowledge but does not use it for evil - Adam and Eve gained this knowledge but it corrupted them and they became imperfect.

if god had not created the emotions Greed, Lust as part of the concept of 'free will' i.e had they been ommitted this would not have happened. they were imperfect before, because no human can be perfect...because there will have been a point in their lives before they could possibly understand god, let alone embrace him or rever or even worship him...IF they had died then, would they have still been perfect according to your definition?

Did He? How do you come up with that?
He divided mankind at the Tower of Babel in as much as giving different languages.

why would you divide people by anything. language aside, skin colour aside...knowing how tribalistic he created humans to be, why provide such huge natural divides? makes no sense.

your stories of jesus are no more compelling than those of mohammed. or of many that had come before, why did you choose to believe so firmly in jesus, and not say, mohammad. maybe you got it wrong? maybe you were tricked?

but was it your fault? should you be punished eternally for it? of course not, again it makes no sense to be like that.

this all goes back to, why did god have a need to create relationships with beings far more insignificant than he? was he bored? why does he need the prayer of billions of people, does it make him feel like a bigger being?
 
You keep saying it doesn't make sense but of course it doesn't for the above reasons as that you don't believe God did what He did for those reasons.

i say this because none of it makes any sense whatsoever. it makes as much sense to believe in zeus, nordin or whoever - yet you do not, you choose to blindly follow this particular path - rightly or wrongly. i hope for your sake, rightly...but who knows...maybe there is no right path?

Faith has to come into it somewhere

thats a big assumption, why does it? who said so? you are told to believe this by your fellow man, hence you believe this. but really there is no credible evidence to believe that this could, or even should be the case.

Unfortunately someone who doesn't want to believe it is like a man having never opened his eyes all his life

it is unfortunate that talking to someone such as yourself who has clearly never opened their eyes and seen the millions of people who have died needlessly just so that god could have the company of some decent souls in heaven. when you think about it, it is utterly redicolous. there is no come back to what happens to a child who dies befor ehe or she can even understand what religion is, let alone abide by it..

hence why catholics had to create the idea of child baptism to force them into it through a completely arbitary human act.

but for instance, do you agree that without god, there would be no suffering? that is a good place to start logically...
 
Last edited:
that much is obvious. Man has already created god, or usually gods...we are just in the last gasp grip of the monotheistic belief in a single god known as god at the moment. im hoping it all goes away sooner than later, then we can construct the next god. maybe he will be digital this time?
 
But you evidently believe in God as you just said He causes suffering. Agnostic professes that it is not possible to prove the existence of a ‘first cause’ or a god.

I do not belive in God. I was arguing from the point of view that the bible was true. For me it is a completely hypothetical situation. Using the same book that you are it is quite obvious that God does indeed cause suffering. As for your definition of agnostic, that isn't quite true. You can also not care either way rather than have no proof either way.

Erm, no it is not ok but if you read the bible you can see that God more than warns people to change their ways – some do some don’t but it is the people who have brought it upon themselves and their households.
As for babies, they obviously had no choice whatsoever so there is an age of accountability where someone can know right from wrong, sin basically, obviously young children and babies come into that category. Also someone would probably want to bring up mentally disabled people as not having the opportunity to know right from wrong, they would fall into that category.

So if you accept that Soddom, Gommorah, the first born of Egypt, the peoples of the flood had examples of all of the above then God killed them even when they had no choice or chance to do good. Now it could be argued that he knew that all of them would grow up to be evil anyway so no great loss.


Of course it's a stretch because you're a fence sitter and don't know what you believe because your agnostic - no offence but how can you possibly argue this topic without either believing in God (in whatever form you choose) or are an atheist?

Because I can take an objective look at the evidence and say "Yup, God as the Christian Bible defines him does indeed cause suffering."? Does you being a Christian mean you are unable to comment on the validity of any other religion?

Fact is Jesus will judge each and every one of us to see, 1) whether our names are written in the Lamb’s Book of Life…… i.e. born again, 2) according to our works for those whose names are in there.

If he exists. Which I currently doubt.

Whatever does it for you mate, I prefer my wife thanks.

I have been married myself for almost 15 years now, but what has that got to do with anything? Why do you pick and choose which bits of the old testament now apply if, according to your interpretation of the bible, none of it applies any more?

Read my first comments. If I shoot you in the face that has nothing to do with God, I held the gun and pulled the trigger, my choice and free will decision, you die or are seriously wounded and I suffer punishment from the government and if I haven’t repented (truly) to God then I will go to hell.

And the relevance to the current argument is what exactly? On the question "Does God cause suffering?" all I need to do is look at the suffering God himself has caused directly (as recorded in the Christian Bible) to say that "Yes, yes he does." I am not even attributing mans actions to god in this case.


LOL, does make me laugh that comment – it isn’t MY version.
You obviously think God setup the system to be against you as you don’t understand it, I suggest you read John with an open mind.

I have, I am quite widely read when it comes to religion (though not as widely read as quite a few others on this forum). I am still unable to believe in God without proof. Therefore I am damned to hell. Cest la vie. I wonder, how open minded are you? How many religious texts have you read to confirm to you that yours is the true one?

Why would God want to prove He exists when He has done that and more already? Jesus, creation, biblical history – oh but wait, you don’t really believe much of those or choose to sit on the fence so that proof isn’t good enough.

The problem is that a literal Biblical creation is directly contradicted by even more evidence than one book. The bible is also directly contradicted by many other religious works and creation myths. There is little to actually say "Yes, the bible is true" other than faith. I don't have that faith, without decent evidence I will never have that faith.


Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
Eph 2:9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.

Let me guess? KJV christian?
 
You assume that God either exists and is directly responsible or God doesn't exist and is not directly responsible. What if he does exist, and just doesn't care? or what if with the gift of freewill, we are expected to stand or fall on our own merit.

Suffering in all its forms is entirely subjective, we have the freewill to end our own suffering at any time, one way or another. Some people thrive on suffering, their own and/or that of others.

Actually no, I am not assuming that at all. My answer with regards to "Does God cause suffering?" was purely an interpretation of Abrahamic God as described in the Bible. Nothing more, nothing less and obviously His direct interventions caused suffering. It is purely a hypothetical as far as I am concerned. If God doesn't exist or is not directly responsible then the answer is completely different.
 
So if you accept that Soddom, Gommorah, the first born of Egypt, the peoples of the flood had examples of all of the above then God killed them even when they had no choice or chance to do good. Now it could be argued that he knew that all of them would grow up to be evil anyway so no great loss.

I gave you an answer to this at least twice.

People who die innocent (such as children), are given the possibility of being brought back to life in a future society governed directly by God and his kingdom.

You don't have to believe it, but you do have to accept that this is what Christians believe.

Yes, innocents have died, but God has the power to right all injustices that have ever been committed in the entire history of the world.

Would you please not continue to cry "God kills innocents!" and then completely ignore all the responses?
 
Actually no, I am not assuming that at all. My answer with regards to "Does God cause suffering?" was purely an interpretation of Abrahamic God as described in the Bible. Nothing more, nothing less and obviously His direct interventions caused suffering. It is purely a hypothetical as far as I am concerned. If God doesn't exist or is not directly responsible then the answer is completely different.


I see, I was looking at "God" in a broader sense and not in the personifcation deity of the Abrahamic religions.
 
Back
Top Bottom