VXR Crash @ The Ring last weekend ....

Housey said:
I read your post as trying to afirm to me that torquesteer is an example
of oversteer, which if you read my post again you can clearly see I am comfortable with that. I read it and chose to ignore it. Then you went in and edited again, got anal about how I knew it was 15mph when it was little more than a gut feel based on seeing these sort of things before. You were actually agreeing. If I read you wrong then sorry, these things happen on the Internet, I'd move on if I was you.
Click to expand...

On the whole I agreed with your post. I just wanted to know where your figures came from.

I'd have gone for 17.6MPH too quick :p
 
I can't beleive JanesyB went onto the VXR forum to get into an argument with them about how they perceive our forum. Seriously bad form indeed, made us look very bad by doing that. They are just as entitled to their opinion on what we post here as we are to to our opinion about the crash.

And as for telling a member on that forum with 1500 posts that he hasn't got a VXR so he doesnt belong there, shameful :(

/shakes head

They think we are a bunch of douchebags for being critical of the guy who crashed, you honestly thought you could change that opinion by going over there and basically trashing the thread?
 
Last edited:
What and the bigoted rubbish the Fox posted doesn't make the forum look bad? Because that's the main bone of contention here really. As for telling someone they don't belong there, that was clearly said in jest.

I'm not even going further into it but if you think I am bringing the forum into disrupute, look at the snobbish bile Fox has posted and have a think.

But yes, engaging a 'discussion' was probably the wrong thing to do, it's not as if they love us from the MrLol scandal anyway ;)
 
Last edited:
Janesy B said:
What and the bigoted rubbish the Fox posted doesn't make the forum look bad? Because that's the main bone of contention here really. As for telling someone they don't belong there, that was clearly said in jest.

I'm not even going further into it but if you think I am bringing the forum into disrupute, look at the snobbish bile you have posted and have a think.
Click to expand...

You have gone there and you cant even win the argument with them, how have you let a bunch of chav Vauxhal owners out smart you?! :confused:

My god your posting is that of a 15 year old, no wonder you drive a 1.2 Fiesta.
 
hurfdurf said:
You have gone there and you cant even win the argument with them, how have you let a bunch of chav Vauxhal owners out smart you?! :confused:

My god your posting is that of a 15 year old, no wonder you drive a 1.2 Fiesta.
Click to expand...

Seriously, is there any need to call someone a chav because they own a Vauxhall?? That is why they are calling OCUK what they are, because you're all so far stuck up your own backsides it's untrue. A car DOES NOT define someone ! :rolleyes:
 
hurfdurf said:
You have gone there and you cant even win the argument with them, how have you let a bunch of chav Vauxhal owners out smart you?! :confused:

My god your posting is that of a 15 year old, no wonder you drive a 1.2 Fiesta.
Click to expand...

Dragged me down to their level and beat me with experience tbh.

As for your second comment, lol@ you. Don't make financial assumptions about me.
 
Janesy B said:
As for your second comment, lol@ you. Don't make financial assumptions about me.
Click to expand...

Where have I made a financial assumption? You drive the car in your sig do you not? Or do you just think old poverty spec Fiesta's are so desirable you have one in your sig for admirations sake but really you drive a Gallardo.
 
We have infighting, name calling, chav naming, history lessons, driving instruction, stuff about FWD cars killing babies, elocution lessons and now forum wars. I approve this thread and am off to the VXR forums to tell them they are all poo bums, that'll learn em good.
 
ScoobyDoo69 said:
Seriously, is there any need to call someone a chav because they own a Vauxhall?? That is why they are calling OCUK what they are, because you're all so far stuck up your own backsides it's untrue. A car DOES NOT define someone ! :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

It wasn't completely serious and I wasn't calling the owners chavs, but the cars.
 
hurfdurf said:
Where have I made a financial assumption? You drive the car in your sig do you not? Or do you just think old poverty spec Fiesta's are so desirable you have one in your sig for admirations sake but really you drive a Gallardo.
Click to expand...

'No wonder you drive a 1.2 Fiesta' what could be possibly meant other than I am not smart enough afford anything else?
 
All we need now is a Mondeo, Diesel Fuel savings, Emissions Tax savings and some badly taken photographs and we might have encompassed the whole of OCuK motors in a single thread.
 
hurfdurf said:
Where have I made a financial assumption? You drive the car in your sig do you not? Or do you just think old poverty spec Fiesta's are so desirable you have one in your sig for admirations sake but really you drive a Gallardo.
Click to expand...

Don't attack people because they drive a **** car. I drive a Ford Ka...

What do you drive that is so awesome?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom