Disabled women to pay £13k in compo

In my experience a lot of the drivers of these things treat them like tanks that you've to get out of the way of, driven as fast as they'll go with the get out of my way - I'm bigger than you attitude.
If I rode my mountain bike down pavements like they do someone would soon have a word.

Me and my room mate were walking along the other day and an old fella was coming towards us on one. I moved out the way onto the grass to allow him through, Yet he decided to try and drive over my roommate instead making her move aswell! He Gave us a right dirty look too. For the sake of steering around her... I should have slapped him on his forehead as he passed us :mad:
 
Not as i dont mind these scooters the attutide of some of the old foke on them is disgraceful (not all of them though!) Been hit a few times by them after it not even my fault, and the dirty look and the abuse i get from them would but some chavs to shame! Suppose cranky old people and the power the think they get on scooters is a not good compo.
 
You're knee must have got pretty ****ed up to have the heartlessness to sue a 60 year old disabled women who cant walk lol

So you're working, someone crashes INTO YOU stopping you being able to work for several months, maybe having a painful operation to fix damage and months of pain and recouperation, but its heartless to sue the moron who did it to you?


The thing that seems to be missing in the article is it says the woman PREVIOUSLY claimed that someone hit her stationary scooter, sending her one into this employee. But doesn't say what she's claiming now, by saying "previously claimed" it sounds to me like she was BS'ing and passing the blame, but later on she changed her story and it was her fault.

But shoddy journalism doesn't seem to actually have that part included, I just can't see why you'd use the term "previously claimed" unless, well, her story changed later on.

Who knows, then again the store SHOULD have insurance to cover their employee's who get injured on the job and they should have specific insurance to cover injury from people in scooters if its store policy to allow them in.

If the worker didn't get anything from her employee's and is being screwed, what choice do they have, its not their fault they can't work after being injured. Though it sounds to me like the store is just as culpable and this is the kind of story where you'd usually here of the employee getting a huge insurance payout from the supermarket.
 
Disabled really **** me off how they just run into you. But £13000 odd is just wrong, I wouldn't pay it and protest.

Reverse the roles then.
You've had your knee injured and now you can't play football anymore, or go to the gym, or run etc.
You would walk out of the court thinking that £13,000 wasn't enough.
 
Last edited:
I must admit i've never seen a 20mph one, I think the maximum you can legally use on the road without a licence is 8mph, and 4mph on the pavement thanks to fairly specific exemptions for them.

You're bang on Wolfie. I've recently covered this and that's right. :)
 
You're knee must have got pretty ****ed up to have the heartlessness to sue a 60 year old disabled women who cant walk lol

And what sort of person would you be if through your own negligence you injure someone enough that they are awarded £13,000 in compensation? and appear to take no responsibility for your actions?

She has the nerve to come out with utter crap like "It puts me in a vulnerable position - do I ever go shopping again?" in a pathetic attempt to make her appear to be the victim in all this. Yeah you can go shopping, insurance wouldnt be a bad idea and looking where your going wouldnt hurt either.

"How many people drive these scooters? We can't just sit down and take this." yeah, chance of her getting off her lazy arse would be a fine thing.
 
disabled or not, she is still an idiot. Note she initially lied about the incident too.
 
She has the nerve to come out with utter crap like "It puts me in a vulnerable position - do I ever go shopping again?" in a pathetic attempt to make her appear to be the victim in all this. Yeah you can go shopping, insurance wouldnt be a bad idea and looking where your going wouldnt hurt either.

"How many people drive these scooters? We can't just sit down and take this." yeah, chance of her getting off her lazy arse would be a fine thing.

+1

What about showing some remorse to the victim?
I wonder what injury was sustained to get a 13k payout.
 
Clearly they should have flashing lights and sirens on them to increasve visibility. Or she could fit a ships foghorn to it.
 
150kg with rider at 1.8m/s has a momentum of 270N/s, it could easily harm someone.

or worse

what are the implications if one of these hit a shelf system in the supermarket, and the whole shelf fell on somebody ??

worst case scenario granted but think like this...


and you get the idea. Surely the solution to this is that they should need mandatory insurance ?
 
she did the crime she should pay the fine... Theres a women round my way that does about 15mph on the pavement in her cripple car, if she was to hit someone its gonna hurt.

I once stopped an old dear from tripping over on the pavement, she was doing a sort of trip run that would have ended in a fall, i scooped her up and she told me to "get my hands off her" i think i told her to eff herself i was raging i couldn't believe it.
 
In my experience a lot of the drivers of these things treat them like tanks that you've to get out of the way of, driven as fast as they'll go with the get out of my way - I'm bigger than you attitude.
If I rode my mountain bike down pavements like they do someone would soon have a word.

I liked the jugdement and i am willing to bet that this is how the disabled woman was driving for it to smash into a trolly hard enough to cause injury

They are a menice sometimes and need to made an example of
 
Reverse the roles then.
You've had your knee injured and now you can't play football anymore, or go to the gym, or run etc.
You would walk out of the court thinking that £13,000 wasn't enough.

That was my initial thought as well. If you had to stop work due to the injury it actually turns into something quite serious.
 
Back
Top Bottom