Wedding on Sunday.
- Thread starter Rojin
- Start date
I don't know I would go that far! A big part of choosing the photographer is meeting with them, I'm sure in an informal environment and discussing the above clause that Peter wouldn't suddenly start threatening to invade if they didn't comply!
lol, no, but if they hear or see the clause before speaking to him then chances are they would back out. If he isn't fussed about having it in there, as he has stated already, just take it out and replace it with something raymond Lin has
Another thing, are you staying over at the venue? (if you can) As you can always take the camera and leave it in your room. I wouldn't want to leave it in the car just in case.
It's better to have it and not need it than want it and not have it
Now I'm not very happy. I've been told that I AM taking my camera... The bride and groom to be are friends and they like photos I've taken, all of a sudden I feel under pressure! I think the camera bag will be fully packed!
That's the thing with friends, you'll need to draw a line to free help on demand and willing help as a gift/favour. Your friends should either make you the first photographer if they really liked your shots or at least gave you some heads up.
I personally had to draw a line when I went on a group dinner with my uni Malaysian Society. Just because one knows how to use a camera and own a DSLR doesn't automatically makes me to photographer for every occasion, especially when they didn't ask ahead of the event (in my case, some guy brought a D90 and the Exo thought it's nice to shove it on to me to shoot). I politely said no as I was not expecting to shoot and was out to enjoy myself.
What I'm trying to (with my rather long winded reply) say is, draw the line between doing it happily as a favour / gift for a happy occasion rather than be forced to 'work' when you're just hoping to play / candid on that day.
I personally had to draw a line when I went on a group dinner with my uni Malaysian Society. Just because one knows how to use a camera and own a DSLR doesn't automatically makes me to photographer for every occasion, especially when they didn't ask ahead of the event (in my case, some guy brought a D90 and the Exo thought it's nice to shove it on to me to shoot). I politely said no as I was not expecting to shoot and was out to enjoy myself.
What I'm trying to (with my rather long winded reply) say is, draw the line between doing it happily as a favour / gift for a happy occasion rather than be forced to 'work' when you're just hoping to play / candid on that day.
Good standard practice disclaimer like the ones shown is a good way to go. But in my experience at weddings the photographers have always been friendly with me and my d200. At my sisters wedding I got chatting away with the guy, kept my distance at the formal stuff, then at the meal/dance he gave me his spare d300 with a f1.4 50mm to play about with. Was good to compare his shots versus my drunken attempts.
Rojin, that was pretty much what happened to me at the last wedding they basically said they wanted me as a second shooter so I hired myself the 70-200mm, banged it on the D60 and had some fun. I also realised that I have reached the limitations of my camera but I don't think that will happen with yours
It really comes down to you though and what you want out of the day. Bride had me take photos of her getting ready as the pro was with the groom. Then off to the church and took the aisle shots for them, off to reception and was dragged out with the B&G, tog and videographer into the country. Then loads of candids, cake cutting, first dance and the disco after. I didn't drink all night and the missus was understanding, she hung out with friends.
I'd suggest saying you'll take it, use if for ceremony up to the first dance, then enjoy yourself
It really comes down to you though and what you want out of the day. Bride had me take photos of her getting ready as the pro was with the groom. Then off to the church and took the aisle shots for them, off to reception and was dragged out with the B&G, tog and videographer into the country. Then loads of candids, cake cutting, first dance and the disco after. I didn't drink all night and the missus was understanding, she hung out with friends.
I'd suggest saying you'll take it, use if for ceremony up to the first dance, then enjoy yourself
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Oct 2005
- Posts
- 5,718
- Location
- Derbyshire
I read about another T&C on TP forum that is written into contracts.
"The Wedding party shall (on demand) kiss my bottom and bow before me; any dissenting guests will be told by the Bride to Sod Off and the Groom shall take them by the scruff of their neck and sling them off the premises.
I, the Photographer, shall be referred to as 'God' throughout the proceedings and a minimum of two semi-naked beautiful females will lay rose petals at my feet wherever I go. I reserve the right to 'sample' the Bride intimately in the Bridal Suite and of course prior to the Groom doing so.
If anyone incurs my displeasure at any time and for any reason, the Bride & Groom do hereby forfeit their home and all their possessions; there is no right of appeal
"The Wedding party shall (on demand) kiss my bottom and bow before me; any dissenting guests will be told by the Bride to Sod Off and the Groom shall take them by the scruff of their neck and sling them off the premises.
I, the Photographer, shall be referred to as 'God' throughout the proceedings and a minimum of two semi-naked beautiful females will lay rose petals at my feet wherever I go. I reserve the right to 'sample' the Bride intimately in the Bridal Suite and of course prior to the Groom doing so.
If anyone incurs my displeasure at any time and for any reason, the Bride & Groom do hereby forfeit their home and all their possessions; there is no right of appeal
Associate
- Joined
- 27 Jun 2007
- Posts
- 1,777
I have been in a similar position; but what I went for was pure candids. I concentrated on capturing 'moments'. Whether that be a couple of oldies in the corner having a smooch, or some kids having fun under a table. This for me is what wedding photography is all about. You also have no pressure on you whatsoever so are in a much better position than the actual photographer as he will be more focused on capturing whats on his list. Have fun!
Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 20,189
- Location
- Middlesbrough
Amended
85mm would be ok, but personally i'd be looking at the 70-200mm with the occasion use of the 24-70mm.
I had the 70-200mm 2.8 for my d60 so had to deal with the crop as well but it really allowed me to get some nice shots of people who had no idea I was there. Wish I had hired the 24-70mm as well as with some shots i had to take a few steps back.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 77,729
- Location
- Wish i was in a Ramen Shop Counter
What's with people using 70-200 as their main lens???
I had them with me in 2 of my weddings and they rarely lef the bag, all you end up are portraits style shots. Gets kinda boring after looking at a few IMO.
I had them with me in 2 of my weddings and they rarely lef the bag, all you end up are portraits style shots. Gets kinda boring after looking at a few IMO.
Taken with a 70-200mm 2.8 at the 70mm end.
In fact, only about 40% of my shots were portraits.
My girlfriend's bro got married on Saturday 15th (just gone) and paid £1000 for photos + video and the guy that was doing the video at the ceremony (vowls etc) got right in the way of the father / mother and guests. I mean right next to them 3ft if that nobody could see a thing!! i really wanted to say OI muppet. Gf's mother moved seats but still the father couldn't see.
The woman taking the photos was VERY rude and blunt too. At one point she wanted folk on stairs and a little girl of 3yr (maybe less) was happy just running about (i know its not good with kids running around at a wedding but i don't care) anyway before she was going to take a shot she pushed the girl out the way " can you get out of the picture" in a loud tone.
Many people didn't like her/him what so ever!
IF that was my wedding i would have said GTFO
The woman taking the photos was VERY rude and blunt too. At one point she wanted folk on stairs and a little girl of 3yr (maybe less) was happy just running about (i know its not good with kids running around at a wedding but i don't care) anyway before she was going to take a shot she pushed the girl out the way " can you get out of the picture" in a loud tone.
Many people didn't like her/him what so ever!
IF that was my wedding i would have said GTFO
Last edited:
That sucks. We had a lovely lady who we met up with beforehand, and both of us liked. On the day it was like having another guest, but one that was in charge of getting the pictures. I think she appreciated sitting with the other guests for the meal etc. as well. Although maybe not so much for sitting her next to one of my single mates who's a nightmare!