Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Aug 2008
- Posts
- 10,477
- Location
- Bath, England
i found it entertaining, not gory/intimidating really, just bizarre.
apparently, as this is called 1st sequence, there's a full sequence film scheduled for 2011 release
can't wait to see how far they go with that one
apparently, as this is called 1st sequence, there's a full sequence film scheduled for 2011 release
can't wait to see how far they go with that one
yea it is but the directors actually got clarification from doctors and they said it would actually survive for a month or so before dying! ill try find it where they said it again! friend linked me it the other week!
No he isn't! watch the film properly and you'll see how the other 2 die before the girl in the middle! the woman in the middle has it the worst!
its the most disturbing film psychologically, just put yourself in there position and its quiet possibly the worst way you could ever live the last few days of your life! minginggggggggggggg!
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2008
- Posts
- 11,114
Errmmm, SPOILER tags?
It's the most harrowing part of the ending. Sandwiched there between two dead bodies with no hope of rescue.
Live...with a horribly scarred face, scarred ass, no teeth...wouldn't be much of a life
It's an appallingly bad film. It is 90s porn without the sex. It goes for shock value instead of storyline or half decent actors.
Steer clear, not worth the time it takes to watch. Will be on Bravo inside a year where no-one will watch it.
Steer clear, not worth the time it takes to watch. Will be on Bravo inside a year where no-one will watch it.
Associate
- Joined
- 25 Mar 2009
- Posts
- 1,688
- Location
- Leeds, UK
I've just watched this....I actually don't know what to say....
..
Wtf?
..
Wtf?
It's just The Aristocrats in film form. It's shock art. I'll concede that it probably is art insofar as it's clearly a talking point, though that is a fairly low bar at which to define art. It's just not clever, though, is it? It's a cheap attempt to garner interest in something by making it revolting. I don't even really buy that it's well made or whatever - if you were a good film-maker, I doubt you'd be resorting to this sort of thing.
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2009
- Posts
- 19,893
- Location
- Wales
Bad acting, predictable plot, plain weird, pretty bad film overall imo.
Why is it sickening?
I've seen plenty of films that you could call sick. It's no more sick than any other gross-out film.
But is it clever? Is it really, actually, truly art? I'm going to make a film about a man raping women, waiting till they give birth, then raping their babies in front of them, then making them eat the baby's legs while it's still alive, then making them eat the poop from when they've digested the baby then killing the mother and freezing her body and then feeding them to the double amputee baby when it grows up. Give me money.
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2009
- Posts
- 19,893
- Location
- Wales
The trouble with all of these things is that it's a race to the bottom, no pun intended. It's a contest to see who can come up with the most disgusting thing and figure out a way to produce a book or film or whatever about it. But what does that prove? That you have a revolting imagination? Good for you. I'm sure you're very pleased with yourself, you ****ing fruitcake.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2008
- Posts
- 11,114
Just curious...have you seen it?
I've spoken to the director and the origins of the film weren't that he was trying to come up with the sickest thing he could. Rather, he had a personal saying years ago - when he really didn't like someone he'd mutter "I'd love to sew that guy to a trucker's ***hole". He said it so someone once and they said "Ew, that's sick! You should make that into a movie!"
So he did.