****Fresh random image thread (with rule addition)Every post MUST contain an image!****
- Thread starter Gilly
- Start date
- Status
Associate
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2005
- Posts
- 1,179
- Location
- Wakefield
Don't see why. If the student loses then surely he or she does have to pay, as the court will have ordered them to pay despite the earlier agreement, therefore the paradoxical effect of "not paying until I win my first case" created by the contract is negated by the order of the court?
Associate
- Joined
- 11 Jun 2009
- Posts
- 1,249
And even if he wins, he still has to pay according to his own rule, regardless of the fact that the court wont order him to pay. So it's win/win for the teacher, surely?
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 20,349
- Location
- Stanley Hotel, Colorado
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 2,815
- Location
- Staffordshire
- Status