New to DSLRs, testing out macro shots

Permabanned
Joined
31 May 2007
Posts
10,721
Location
Liverpool
So, I got my first DSLR last week, an EOS 500D and I've been having some fun taking some macro shots.

Here's a few if anyone's interested. :p

IMG_1222.png


IMG_1208.png


IMG_1193.png


IMG_1189.png


IMG_1184.png


IMG_1154.png


IMG_1149.png


IMG_1147.png


IMG_1142.png


IMG_1107.png


IMG_1103.png
 
Personally i'm not really a fan of 5 but one and two aren't bad. One especially has that abstract feel to it.:)
 
I like this
IMG_1184.png


But I get the feeling you need to shoot wider open, (higher F number) as parts of the shot look unfocused (the bottom of the picture)
 
No, he needs to stop down to a lower "F number". ;)

"Wider open" and a higher f stop would mean less DoF...

f/x numbers are a ratio so the larger the number after the "/" the larger the hole (or aperture) and the smaller the DoF. So f/2.8 will be a big hole with less DoF and "wider open" than f/11 which would be a much smaller hole and closed down.
 
Personally i'm not really a fan of 5 but one and two aren't bad. One especially has that abstract feel to it.:)

Thanks :) I've just been trying various levels of magnification. Getting as close as possible.
 
No, he needs to stop down to a lower "F number". ;)

"Wider open" and a higher f stop would mean less DoF...

f/x numbers are a ratio so the larger the number after the "/" the larger the hole (or aperture) and the smaller the DoF. So f/2.8 will be a big hole with less DoF and "wider open" than f/11 which would be a much smaller hole and closed down.

I took them with the lowest F number I could. F/4.5, when I increase the F number, the DOF increases. A photo of an object at F/4.5 would result in the background being blurred, when I increase the F number, the background comes more in to focus.
 
No, you decrease the f- number. Remember, it's a ratio, so "1/the aperture" not just the aperture. Bit like 1/2 is bigger than 1/4 (half is bigger than a quarter) so f/2.8 is bigger than f/4. :)

f/4 makes the aperture (hole in the lens) smaller than an aperture of f/2.8. That smaller hole of f/4 will increase the depth of field but reduce the available light. :)

Have a read of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperture

It is rather confusing at the beginning. :p
 
No, you decrease the f- number. Remember, it's a ratio, so "1/the aperture" not just the aperture. Bit like 1/2 is bigger than 1/4 (half is bigger than a quarter) so f/2.8 is bigger than f/4. :)

f/4 makes the aperture (hole in the lens) smaller than an aperture of f/2.8. That smaller hole of f/4 will increase the depth of field but reduce the available light. :)

Have a read of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperture

It is rather confusing at the beginning. :p

I'm just saying that when I raise the F number on my camera, the DOF increases. I don't quite get it my self, but when I increase the F number, the DOF increases. :p
 
I'm just saying that when I raise the F number on my camera, the DOF increases. I don't quite get it my self, but when I increase the F number, the DOF increases. :p

I see where you're getting the idea from*, however... it's wrong... :p

It's just easier discussing things when you use the correct terminology. :)

*Most cameras will just have the number as 4.0 etc not 1/4.0 etc.
 
I see where you're getting the idea from*, however... it's wrong... :p

It's just easier discussing things when you use the correct terminology. :)

*Most cameras will just have the number as 4.0 etc not 1/4.0 etc.

I'm not disagreeing :p I was just saying after what twoblacklines said. It's a higher number, but the higher number equates to a ratio that means a smaller aperture. (I get that bit) Just from looking at the camera, it's represented as a larger number when it just says "F", what that number means is different to the fact that it's a higher number :p we're all being pedantic now though lol :D
 
Back
Top Bottom