Gotta be careful when comparing correlation and causation and especially drawing further conclusions. Sure people from Oxbridge turn up in high society - but is that because the offspring of people in high society tend to go to Oxbridge in the first place? The fact that they end up in high society may have more to do with the fact they went to Oxbridge rather than obtaining high society on some more objective merit.
Exactly.
I didn't intend to claim all the cleverest people attend Oxbridge, I meant (in different wording) that people who go there are pretty much all among the cleverest. And furthermore, of that category notionally called the 'cleverest' the ones that attend Oxbridge are no doubt the best educated. A failing of the system, maybe, but I still wouldn't mind them running the country.
You might get clever people who didn't attend Oxbridge, but are they as likely to have the combination of high self motivation, ambition, intelligence, confidence etc as people of the same potential intelligence who were not fortunate enough to get that chance?
edit: and for record (not that it should matter) I'm a university dropout who now works alongside graduates as colleagues/peers day-in and day-out and have the same responsibilities as them but get paid less for my level of experience because I don't have a degree. By rights I should hate that fact and claim that any level of university education is uneccessary for success, but from experience the graduates that are from Oxbridge that I work with really do have their **** together.
That could and should be contended, because it depends on what educational subject you are on about.
Oxbridge isn't top of the world for everything.
Anyway, the point i was making is having a degree isn't a prerequisite in my mind for the job. It isn't for an MP anyway.
Last edited: