INTEL CORE i5 670 3.46GHz CPU - ONLY £199.98 INC VAT

[Ace Modder]

Intel Core i5 670 3.46GHz (Clarkdale) (Socket LGA1156) - Retail + Napoleon Total War @ £199.99 inc VAT

The new 2010 Intel® Core™ i5 processor, part of Intel’s new family of processors, puts smart performance well within your reach. It delivers solid performance for everyday applications, with the ability to increase speed as needed for demanding tasks. Thanks to new Intel® Turbo Boost Technology,1 the new 2010 Intel® Core™ i5 processor automatically adapts to whatever you are doing on your PC, dialing-up speed to respond quickly to your needs. The new 2010 Intel® Core™ i5 processor: that’s smart performance with a speed boost. The new 2010 Intel® Core™ i5 processor also features Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology,2 which enables each core of your processor to work on two tasks at the same time, delivering the performance you need for smart multitasking. Don’t let too many open applications slow you and your PC down. Get smart performance now.

- Lithography Process: 32 nm
- Cores: 2
- Threads: 4
- Frequency: 3.46 GHz
- Intel Turbo Boost: 3.73GHz
- Integrated Graphics Frequency: 733 MHz
- Cache: 4 MB shared L3
- Memory Controller: Dual channel DDR3 800/1066/1333 MHz
- TDP: 73W
- Socket: LGA1156

Only £199.99 inc VAT.

ORDER NOW

 

[Nodiggidy123]

apart from this being 32nm why would someone choose this over a 750?

 

[Martini1991]

A 200 quid dual core? Yes please.

 

[Hotwired]

A 200 quid dual core? Yes please.

People bought the E8600

 

[infernox]

it says its a quad yet it has only 2 cores :O maybe for the threads

still £200 for a dual screw that

would rather get a 1090T or 955

 

[Lleot]

I don't think overclockers have used the correct box art. i5 670 is a Dual core - not a quad core desktop model cpu.

 

[Redmint]

It's a pre-OCed i3!

 

[drunkenmaster]

People bought the E8600

All that proves is, idiots aren't a new phenomena. Seriously, is it actually a quad core or a dual core, which bits wrong. £200 just seems, beyond ridiculous for a dual core even with a fantastic IGP, let alone the turd Intel's duct taped onto their core.

http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=43556

Nope, deffo a dual core, with hyperthreading, and am I missing something or is 73W pretty horrible for a dual core on the next process down, yes even considering a 3-5w IGP included. Surely a 95W quad should be pushing lower than 75W when shrunken to 32nm, let alone a dual?

 

[Rroff]

Yeah its a dual core with hyper threading... and I agree 73w isn't great for what it is... shouldn't be over 65 tops.