It's easy? Just requires a good quick jump from brake to throttle whilst bringing up clutch.
Using the handbrake is even easier

It's easy? Just requires a good quick jump from brake to throttle whilst bringing up clutch.
Or just put the bloody handbrake on![]()
Using the handbrake is even easier![]()
&
Indeed, logic would suggest this is the correct route...but this is asim18.
Must say, when I was a young'un I used to drive like that, pointless though, so these days I drive properly (yes that is a matter of opinion).
Or heel and toe.It's a bit kinder on the car than using the clutch to catch the car from rolling back, you need three feet to do that without the handbrake.
Or heel and toe.
Also if I'm on a road with no parked cars on my side, cars parked on the opposite side with a car coming down towards me with half the car over the central line, if I swipe the entire side of the car whose fault would it be? I'm getting sick of people round my way leaving a 6 foot gap on their side and squeezing me over almost onto the kerb.
No one is arguing mate. It's just what I do. And no, I don't get leg cramp from holding the clutch down.So the car doesn't roll back in the half of second or so it takes to move your right foot from the brake to the accelerator.
It's a pointless argument, there's handbrake there, you might as well use it then get leg cramp from holding the clutch all the time.
So the car doesn't roll back in the half of second or so it takes to move your right foot from the brake to the accelerator.
It's a pointless argument, there's handbrake there, you might as well use it then get leg cramp from holding the clutch all the time.
So the car doesn't roll back in the half of second or so it takes to move your right foot from the brake to the accelerator.