Fair enough.
Do you know in America they FORCE all companies to add folic acid to any bread they produce. So that basically all pregnant women will get folic acid in them as they eat any bread (as will everyone else, which does no harm to them).
Also for a while the UK government was seriously talking about adding a little flouride to all drinking water .. as they reckon the nations teeth would all get better. Of course people would lose the right to 'flouride free water out of the tap' and in the US they have never tasted bread without folic acid in it. In practice the folic acid is effectively being forced on them 'for their own good'.
Just out of interest .. would you be in favour of, or against, governments mass effectively forcing the population down such healthy routes? Making it nigh-on impossible for them to choose to not consume certain things? I'm not talking about 'give the population loads of information', I'm talking about 'All tap water WILL have flouride in it for everyone. full stop.'
Again, it's one of the more difficult 'freedom' questions .. just wondering where you stand out of interest ..
The doesn't seem to be a solution much short of restricting what they can actually spend it on, i.e. food/clothing/utility vouchers rather than cash. But obviously then you impose a restriction on who can accept the payments, and open up a black market for passing them on.The question is, how do you balance the genuine needs of people with the prevention of unforseen consequences and moral hazard?
My missus was told by the NHS to always satisfy her wierd food cravings when preggers, as it is what her body requires at that time.
She hasn't drunk through pregnancy. A few months ago she started moaning on, saying she could absolutely slaughter a single pint of Guinness. Only 1. It was a proper full-on craving. She has perhaps drank it 3 times before in her life!
She bought a pint and guzzled it down and never wanted another one since. The nurse said it was definately an 'iron' requirement FOR THE BABY at the time. Repeat - required by the baby which gave her the craving. She didn't know she needed iron. She only knew she needed guinness!!!
If the landlord has said 'I'm not serving you that guinness it's irresponsible of you' - would that have been reasonable?
I'm somewhat dubious that pregnancy cravings are accurate enough to crave a specific type of food because of a specific nutrient deficiency, no matter what the midwife saidThere's over 10 times the amount of iron in a bowl of weetabix than a pint of guiness![]()
I'm somewhat dubious that pregnancy cravings are accurate enough to crave a specific type of food because of a specific nutrient deficiency, no matter what the midwife said![]()
I don't know the science of it. But I promise you she - totally out of character - specifically suddenly started moaning on and on about wanting a single pint of guinness.
One time also I came home and she was eating slices of lime, on dry toast. And going on about how incredibly nice it was!
Perhaps she's just mental![]()
The real question is why we have to force people...
A personal high point of my life was leaving the maternity hosipital after my wife had just had a miscarriage and having to pass the chainsmoking pregnant women at the door!
Some people are just so stupid and selfish that they are beyong help. While disgusting it remains their choice.
1) the pub should be serving her (i think they should have refused)
2) someone should have said something (I feel I should have)
3) the state should Legislate on this (dodgey ground but i think it should be)
The Landlord has the right to refuse serving anybody & doesn't have to give a reason. I think any decent Landlord would blank her & those that don't should examine there motives.
I know cravings can be completely crazy, and quite often are something they either didn't like or have never had before, I'm just dubious that the reasoning behind them is they subconsciously know it's a good source of what the baby needs