Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
lets just sat intel wins intel is best at everything , amd sucks , cant compete.
some people wont rest until they have forced there opinions on others.
as i said there forums are one side. it's proved it they deleted one of my posts again...
i guess it'll never change...
u think everybody has money to burn.Back off from what?
The truth?
mmj uk was right when he said it depends if your overclocking or not.
I dont play games only edit and encode videos, from the benchmarks ive seen my 1090 beats the 920 in the multithread video encoding (stock speeds) ,i would love to see benchmarks with both chips running at 4.0 ghz and compare them.
u think everybody has money to burn.
maybe i think oh £57.58 is nothing... but as i already said some people would rather pay less and still get very good performance.
Some people wont want to pay the extra. Fair enough?No one is denying that?Some people wont want to pay the extra. Fair enough?

sysmark 2007 video creation - 14.9% in favor of I7
sysmark 2007 - 3D - 8.14% in favor of I7
x264 HD encode test - 1st pass - x264 0.59.819 1.04% in favor of 1055t
x264 HD encode test - 2nd pass - x264 0.59.819 10% in favor of I7
Those are at 3.2ghz not 4ghz. Processor used was the 965 but as said already, other than clock speed its the same as the 920
