Freakin' laser beams (Anti-aircraft laser unveiled at Farnborough Airshow)

I've thought more in-depth about this issue...

We just get a plane covered in a reflective material (As someone mentioned - a chrome jet :p) - then they won't ever fire at the plane because it's 7 years bad luck!

:p

You should be working in the defense industry. :D
 
Giant Flying Mirror? :p
Conventional mirrors do not reflect IR light very well at all.

Clouds are almost completely transparent to most frequencies of IR light - the laser will go straight through them or just vaporise a hole through.

but AFAIK the difficulties are surely as much in spotting and targeting the round as in the laser power needed?

the CIWS Phalanx radar system is exceptionally sophisticated and well developed. it can detect a small incoming missile at supersonic speeds from almost any angle. a large UAV or UCAV wont stand a chance.
 
Last edited:
It can detect a small incoming missile at supersonic speeds from almost any angle. a large UAV or UCAV wont stand a chance.

Also oversighted, but can also hit mortars which are relatively smaller, sure they are slower but impressive none the less.

When they get this thing matured it's going to be awesome.


It truly seems useless to be honest, a conventional missile/round would do the job instantly.


Therein lies the problem, missles and rounds have to account for many parameters where a laser does not, speed of the object(not as much), wind, mavity, also that it needs physical rounds that will run out and need replacing, aren't always 100% accurate, they fire hundreds and hundreds of rounds, if not a thousand or more to shoot down a target when really, only one needs to connect, that's why the use so many rounds, just spray in the general direction and hope one hits.

With it's current tracking system altered to account for the speed of photons, this will make a huge difference.
At sea level, light travels at 299,792,388 m/s and I'm not sure what frequency they are using, but it's still going to be fast considering the current phalanx is optimal at 3.5km, but it's max effective range is "classified".

The othe problem is a lot of these defences are automated, and may fire at objects coming into a base that will make rounds go over civilian population, I'm not sure the procedure here but I believe incidents do occur.
 
Last edited:
Lasers are a prohibited weapon from what I can remember.
Only as a weapon with sole purpose to blind.

Much more accurate than missiles, faster and no ammo, well eventually anyway. Don't know about this one but some of the masssive gas ones can only do a few shots.
 
Artists representation of what the CIWS laser beam looks like which, in reality, is invisible.

Ruined it for me. Until there are like 20 of these on a ship firing red beams all at once I won't be pleased.
 
Only as a weapon with sole purpose to blind.

Much more accurate than missiles, faster and no ammo, well eventually anyway. Don't know about this one but some of the masssive gas ones can only do a few shots.

Whats the point of rules of war when your sole purpose is death and destruction? Thats like calling a fight and saying no punching in the face cause I have work 2morow. Stupid.
 
The othe problem is a lot of these defences are automated, and may fire at objects coming into a base that will make rounds go over civilian population, I'm not sure the procedure here but I believe incidents do occur.

the current CIWS are fully automated but have 100% human oversight - they cannot fire without human authorisation. there have been two incidents where a CIWS on automatic accidentally hit an unintended target.

once, in 1991 where the CIWS detected and engaged Chaff launched by another US navy ship which was deployed against an incoming missile. four rounds hit the chaff-ship (at 5KM!), no injuries.

the other incident was in 1996 where a Japanese destroyer shot down a USAF jet which was towing a target drone for a live fire excercise, it was determined that this was down to human error.

since then there have been no accidents involving the CIWS
 
Back
Top Bottom