Cinebench 10 i7 V X6

[easyrider]

OK

so you can download it from here

Extract and run the 64 bit version

Perform the Rendering 1 cpu test

Perform the x cpu test

the second test will max out your cores 100%

Post a screen shot with your username below left results box and post your results so they look like this so I can copy and paste a table If you don't I will not iclude you in the table

1: easyrider i7 920 @ 4ghz 23208
2: setter i7 920 @ 4ghz 23104
3:ed79 i7 920 @ 4ghz 23062
3: Gareth170 x6 1090 @ 4ghz 21751

 

[setter]

Heres my effort, i7 920 DO@4ghz.

 

[gareth170]

 

[Dark_Angel]

Fairly similar results between the 2 of you, which I suppose is to be expected considering your CPU's are the same clock speed.

NM Gareth beat me :/

 

[ed79]

Just ran this a couple of hours ago after my first real i7 overclock on my new Megahalem cooler.

Results as above @ 4GHz - think it'll go higher but it's already too hot for my liking...

 

[james.miller]

6.5% quicker? is that the difference between mediocre and the fastest there is?

 

[chipps101]

only i7's and x6's ?

 

[Happy]

Here is mine:-

 

[gareth170]

so basicly its ~6.5% quicker but 10-20% high price if u get like for like components

 

[ed79]

Damn, just seen I'm 3rd of 3 (aka last)

6.5% quicker? is that the difference between mediocre and the fastest there is?

Guess another way to test would be an i7 970 or 980 with hyper threading off. I notice the single thread scores are a lot higher on Intel then Amd. Can't argue with the Phenom for value though.

 

[easyrider]

I did another run from my SSD

@ Happy read ther op and follow the instructions

 

[zoomee]

CINEBENCH R11.5 AVAILABLE HERE (Official site):
http://www.maxon.net/downloads/downloads/cinebench/cinebench-115.html

how about using the latest version instead of rusty ol R10


FULL 24/7 - 24hr Prime blend stable - non of that suicide overclock crap here
ALL Fans on silent - can't do with performance if it sounds like a jet engine




Cinebench R10:
1 X 4637
x X 22881

Cinebench R11.5:
CPU: 7.12pts

 

[SC.Jace]

Here's mine - i7 980x @ 3.33ghz

 

[james.miller]

Seem's like the hex don't scale too well, possible pointing to the shared cache i'd imagine. with two extra core a hex should theoretically be doing 1.25-1.5x more work than a quad but that isnt happening.

for example, 14,388 is what i just got with my 3.6ghz quad. Id expect a hex at 3.6ghz to get something in the region of 18k-21k, but it takes 4ghz to reach that with a hex.

Gareth was it definitely load all 6 cores?

 

[easyrider]

Here's mine

Thats not 3.33ghz!

 

[Happy]

@ Happy read ther op and follow the instructions

My bad, uploaded the wrong SS

I have edited my first post.

 

[zoomee]

pls change to latest version of cinebench - we want the latest optimisations right?

R10 - still not much in it like I said before mate, try R11.5 - I think thats where you'll see the gains people talk about

 

[SC.Jace]

Thats not 3.33ghz!

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1302520

 

[gareth170]

Gareth was it definitely load all 6 cores?

yes but single thread test was jumping to each core

 

[easyrider]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1302520

oops my bad read it wrong you hav a 6 core i7