[TW]Fox;17102487 said:I think the fact Vauxhall consider 100k lifetime tells us all we need to know about the junk they sell.
[TW]Fox;17102487 said:I think the fact Vauxhall consider 100k lifetime tells us all we need to know about the junk they sell.
How is that specific to Vauxhall? Surely the fact that they are offering it up to 100k miles shows that they expect no large bills for them to pay up to that figure. What's BMW's warranty like these days? What bills would one expect up to 100k miles in a BMW?
Wow -I find everyone's Clarkson-esque attitudes to Vauxhall here quite amazing. I work in the industry in the powertrain division for one of GM's main rivals, but even I have to admit the quality of engineering and build in their recent models (in particular the new Astra and Insignia) is first class. Fair enough - their interior material quality isn't up to the standard of the premium marques, but they sell to a different market segment.
GM are actually showing great confidence in their product by offering a 100k mile warranty. It is far better than any other warranty on the market - senior management would have done their analysis very carefully and they wouldn't have offered it if they thought it would affect long term profitability of the company.
The fact is that no manufacturer makes a perfect car -all manufacturer's have cars with common faults. Eg. VW have major issues with porous cylinder heads and unreliable DPF's on their diesel engines; BMW have common faults with the ABS and DSC systems on the E87 and E90 range.
Anyways to liken a modern Vauxhall to a 'fridge freezer' is quite frankly absurd.
I do laugh about the snobbery on here. When it comes down to it, are all the BMW's owned on here any more reliable than a "lowly" Vauxhall?
No.
They cost more to fix, that's all.
[TW]Fox;17102487 said:I think the fact Vauxhall consider 100k lifetime tells us all we need to know about the junk they sell.
A lifetime warranty is usually a guarantee on the lifetime of the product on the market rather than the lifetime of the consumer[
Wow -I find everyone's Clarkson-esque attitudes to Vauxhall here quite amazing. I work in the industry in the powertrain division for one of GM's main rivals, but even I have to admit the quality of engineering and build in their recent models (in particular the new Astra and Insignia) is first class. Fair enough - their interior material quality isn't up to the standard of the premium marques, but they sell to a different market segment.
GM are actually showing great confidence in their product by offering a 100k mile warranty. It is far better than any other warranty on the market - senior management would have done their analysis very carefully and they wouldn't have offered it if they thought it would affect long term profitability of the company.
The fact is that no manufacturer makes a perfect car -all manufacturer's have cars with common faults. Eg. VW have major issues with porous cylinder heads and unreliable DPF's on their diesel engines; BMW have common faults with the ABS and DSC systems on the E87 and E90 range.
Anyways to liken a modern Vauxhall to a 'fridge freezer' is quite frankly absurd.
its always fox at the driving seat of the anti vauxhall bandwagon.
think this has to be one of the most bigoted posts i've seen
[TW]Fox;17102487 said:I think the fact Vauxhall consider 100k lifetime tells us all we need to know about the junk they sell.
I read Lifetime warranty as in the lifetime of the car. ( until it is discontinued ) .Baring in mind On average, UK motorists travel 9,628 miles a year, So for the average person the lifetime warranty will last a little over 10 years. And im pretty sure that the car will have been discontinued by 10 years. So it has indeed on average lasted the lifetime of the car.
Edit :