Ford brings back Mustang Boss

Soldato
Joined
11 Jan 2005
Posts
9,961
Location
Birmingham
Just seen this on twitter:

ZgL9T.jpg

dS6is.jpg


http://www.vancouversun.com/cars/Ford+brings+back+Mustang+Boss/3395783/story.html



Helping the intake build power, revised camshafts using a more aggressive grind are actuated with the same twin independent variable camshaft timing (Ti-VCT) mechanism used on the Mustang GT. More aggressive control calibration yields 440 horsepower and 380 lb.-ft. of torque, while still offering a smooth idle and low-end torque for comfortable around-town driving.

A race-inspired clutch with upgraded friction materials transmits power, while a short-throw, close-ratio six-speed manual transmission handles gear change duties.

Power is delivered to a 3.73 ratio rear axle using carbon fiber plates in the limited-slip differential to improve torque handling and longevity. For those who want even more precise control over power delivery, a torque-sensing (Torsen) limited-slip differential is an available option.

“The team at Ford wanted to offer their fellow Mustang enthusiasts something really special – a beautifully balanced factory-built race car that they could drive on the street,” explains Dave Pericak, Mustang chief engineer. “The Boss 302 isn’t something a Mustang GT owner can buy all the parts for out of a catalogue or that a tuner can get by adding a chip. This is a front-to-back re-engineered Mustang with every system designed to make a good driver great and a great driver even better.”

Every Boss features a unique quad exhaust system: Two outlets exit in the rear similar to a standard Mustang GT. The other two outlets exit to either side of the exhaust crossover, sending exhaust through a set of metal discs that act as tuning elements before the pipes terminate just ahead of the rear wheel opening. Visually subtle, the side pipes flow very little exhaust but a lot of exhaust sound, providing a sonic experience unlike any other Mustang – and giving home tuners an additional avenue for modification.

To set Boss apart, each car will have either a black or white roof panel, coordinated to the colour of the side C-stripe. Available exterior colours are Competition Orange, Performance White, Kona Blue Metallic, Yellow Blaze Tri-Coat Metallic and Race Red.

Working in concert with the suspension upgrades, Boss 302 receives unique, lightweight 19-inch black alloy racing wheels in staggered widths: 9 inches in front, 9.5 inches in the rear. The Pirelli PZero summer tires are sized specifically for each end of the vehicle, with the front wheels receiving 255/40ZR-19 tires while the rear stays planted thanks to 285/35ZR-19 rubber.

The combined suspension and tire package allows Boss to achieve a top speed of 155 mph and become the first non-SVT Mustang ever to achieve more than 1.0 g of lateral acceleration.

Boss braking uses Brembo four-piston front calipers acting on 14-inch vented rotors up front. In the back, standard Mustang GT brakes are upgraded with a Boss-specific high-performance pad compound. Combined with vented brake shields and unique Anti-Lock Brake System (ABS) tuning, Boss drivers get maximum control and rapid, repeatable fade-free stops in road and race situations alike.

Inside, a unique Boss steering wheel covered completely in Alcantara suede complements the standard seats, which are trimmed in cloth with a suede-like centre insert to firmly hold occupants in place. Boss customers who want the ultimate seating experience can select a package that includes Recaro buckets, designed by Ford SVT in cooperation with Recaro for high performance Mustang models, and shared between the Boss and GT500.



Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/cars/Ford+brings+back+Mustang+Boss/3395783/story.html#ixzz0wVxhT0RK
 
I read somewhere recently that the chassis of the present gen Mustang was based on a Jag S type. Is that true? If it is, then why is nobody offering full independant aftermarket rear suspensions, as it would imply that there would be mounting options?
 
I read somewhere recently that the chassis of the present gen Mustang was based on a Jag S type. Is that true?

Sort of. The Mustang platform (D2C, shared with nothing) and the S-Type (DEW, now only surviving in the Jag XF IIRC) platform are very loosely related. Very little directly transfers.
 
Hi there

I think it looks stunning and the sound from the Quad exhaust system must be simply amazing. :D

3395458.bin


I also like this bit:-

Ford Mustang fans have, for years, wanted to see the return of the legendary Boss 302. They need not want anymore.

Ford said Friday it has given the green-light to build a new Boss 302 Mustang for 2012.


“The decision to build a modern Boss was not entered into lightly,” said Derrick Kuzak, group vice president, Global Product Development. “The entire team at Ford felt the time was right and with the right ingredients, the world-class 2011 Mustang could support a successful, race-bred, worthy successor to the original Boss 302. For us that meant a production Mustang that could top one of the world’s best – the 2010 BMW M3 – in lap times at Laguna Seca. We met our expectations.”


To celebrate the racing heritage of the new Mustang Boss 302, Ford will also offer a limited number of Boss 302 Laguna Seca models, named for the track where Parnelli Jones won the 1970 Trans-Am season opener in a Boss 302. Aimed at racers more interested in on-track performance than creature comforts, the Boss 302 Laguna Seca has increased body stiffness, a firmer chassis set-up and an aerodynamics package carried over almost in its entirety from the Ford Racing Boss 302R.




Pretty impressive that Ford are making a production Mustang that can beat the M3 at the track, normally customers would have to modify their own Mustangs to get such handling so nice to see Ford now offering Mustangs aimed for corner carving. :D
That track focused 302R sounds very interesting indeed. :)
 
Mate of mine has a mustang, gotta admit they are cool looking, he's very into american cars, his second us car is a corvette stingray.
 
I read somewhere recently that the chassis of the present gen Mustang was based on a Jag S type. Is that true? If it is, then why is nobody offering full independant aftermarket rear suspensions, as it would imply that there would be mounting options?

why bother ?

The mustang is faster round track (stock) than the chevrolet camaro which has full IRS.

whats the point in having IRS if it doesnt make it any faster ? The notion that anything but IRS is bad and makes it a horse and cart is a stupid clarkson-ism
 
why bother ?

The mustang is faster round track (stock) than the chevrolet camaro which has full IRS.

whats the point in having IRS if it doesnt make it any faster ? The notion that anything but IRS is bad and makes it a horse and cart is a stupid clarkson-ism

Agreed, but have Ford not proven that by having a car which has pretty much the same power output lap around a race track quicker than a BMW V8 M3.

Yes the 2010 Mustang beat the Camaro in every handling test in the states. The 2011 Mustang has other minor handling improvements plus now also incorporates a superior engine to the that one in the Camaro as well.

Its just nice to see Ford actually doing all this themselves though now instead of leaving it to the likes of Saleen, Roush, Steeda and others.

Though I guess this does mean that the likes of Roush and Saleen have got to up their game for 2012 cars so they should be something rather special indeed.
 
I was just going to suggest that. Bye Bye Evo! ;)

Yes the new Mustang is very appealing and with this new Boss 302 is a good reason to wait.

Its all down to what I want really, the EVO bug has caught and believe you me there is a lot of fun to be had about just throwing a car around, getting big 4WD powerslides going on in the wet yet still have some element of control. Its this which makes the EVO such an incredible A-B car. :)

But at the same time a Mustang is fun in a completely different way. :)

Still gives me plenty of time to decide on what next car will be as doubt I will change now for at least 12 months and I am always keep a close eye on used R8 prices. :D
 
why bother ?

The mustang is faster round track (stock) than the chevrolet camaro which has full IRS.

whats the point in having IRS if it doesnt make it any faster ? The notion that anything but IRS is bad and makes it a horse and cart is a stupid clarkson-ism

Being a little ignorant on the subject of suspensions, but would IRS have more use on a poor road surface, which I'm guessing Laguna Seca doesn't have.
 
Being a little ignorant on the subject of suspensions, but would IRS have more use on a poor road surface, which I'm guessing Laguna Seca doesn't have.

In the Mustang it copes well with the live axle and with a few modifications like say a watts linkage or adjustable panhard bar it improves its ability over poor surfaces.

But yes if Ford could integrate an IRS into the S197 Mustang chassis it would improve it for the better over poorer surfaces. But bear this in mind the older Mustang Cobras had IRS rear suspension and the new S197 is superior over poor surfaces.

So its not just a case of adding IRS to the new Mustang but doing it properly and I think as it stands Ford believe it would add too much money to the car, increase the weight and effect its ability to put power down. But still I would like to see an option for well engineered IRS setup.

Still the live axle in the back of the new Mustang works well, its a good setup and car consistently out handles the Camaro which has IRS. So its not really something to loose any sleep over.
 
Being a little ignorant on the subject of suspensions, but would IRS have more use on a poor road surface, which I'm guessing Laguna Seca doesn't have.

Well yes for a start the live axle means a greater unsprung weight, which is never good for quick reacting suspension. Plus it will not be able to add on extra camber when there is body lean so you will not be able to keep as big a tyre contact than an unequal length double wishbone setup.

There is no denying that an independant rear axle has its advantages, it's just a question of how much of an improvement it would allow.

Edit - A well designed live rear axle can still be better than a poorly designed independant rear axle.
 
Back
Top Bottom