[TW]Fox;17184716 said:What strange logic.
How good a car is as a banger-buy has absolutely nothing to do with how competent a car a perfect example is? There is no question that the E39 is a better car than the E34 but at this end of the market, condition rules technical ability - after all, you can't enjoy the E39's talents if you buy a nail with utterly ruined suspension thats falling to bits, can you?
What you've effectively done is be confused as to why everyone thinks the Nissan GT-R is great based on the fact that £20k buys a better Subaru Impreza
It happens with everything. A Mk3 Mondeo is a better car than a Mk2 Mondeo, but for £600, a Mk3 is a horrible buy and a Mk is better. A facelift E65 is better than the prefacelift example but for £10k you will buy a nasty facelift or a lovely prefacelift. I really dont get why its that hard to understand.
To sum up - never buy from the bottom of the market. A middile-top of the market E34 costs about the same as a bottom of the market E39 and as a result is a more prudent used buy at this budget. Because lets face it, if you don't mind pouring cash into a car you'd not be spending only a grand on the car in the first place.
I am honestly suprised you don't get this and decide instead to bang on about how obviously the E39 isn't worthy of the awards it won when it was a brand new car because 1k nails are not very good buys![]()
I think you understand and mis-understand me in equal measure here.
Strange logic? yeah, thats certainly me

As for the e39, I was thinking along the lines of most being considerably newer than the e34, obviously. I'm not saying the e39 was not worthy of its awards, quite the opposite.
If say the OP has £1k to spend, he'll have a bigger pool (cess pool?) of e39's to choose from and hopefully for him & his pocket a better chance of a decent one.
I get the feeling the OP would opt for another e34 anyway so this is a bit pointless - hey! its Motors!
Anyway, has the OP tried any e36's yet?