Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
i think 940 is a bit of a fabrication. sure they might whack it to 900+ bump up the voltage and run 3dmark, everything seems fine so they say. wow look at my Overclock!?!
but i doubt its OCCT GPU stable with zero errors over a 10-20minute run.
its like i just read this review of an Asus CU:
http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.p...k=view&id=577&Itemid=72&limit=1&limitstart=16
thats because its not a stable OC!!! i can run at many high MHZ and not get huge artifacting in 3dmark but that doesnt mean its rock stable overclock... its very misleading when they say hey could hit 850 etc and not all reviews are genuine and dont say that they did infact see some minor artifacting at that speed/voltage.
Cheers, just done a quick run of vantage.
OCCT is far to extreme, getting no artifacts running FurMark and Kombustor is a pass for stability, and running a proper game it would be GTA4 being the most intensive.
Core clock of
850 is stable of no artifacts at v1.087 on everything
875 is stable of no artifacts at v1.087 on everything except OCCT
890 is stable of no artifacts at v1.087 on everything except OCCT
900 is stable of no artifacts at v1.087 on everything except OCCT & GTA4
So for me I'm now running it at 890 as I get no artifacts, also crashing was never an issue.
I can't currently clock my Gigabyte 460 over 750 without artifacts appearing in ATI Tool.
It'll be a shame if I happen to have one of the only 460's that won't overclock well.![]()
My girlfriend has very kindly offered to buy me a 460 for my birthday next month. Has anyone tried out the Gainward GTX 460 GS 2GB yet? I cant seem to find reviews for this card at all and i want to know, is there much of a difference in performance between the 2GB and 1GB models (Gigabyte especially as ive had my eye on that one too). I game at 2560 x 1600, so would the extra memory help out much with getting more fps at such a high res? If the performance isnt much different i'll hop on the Gigabyte wagon.
...Until a new game that comes out that pushes your card harder and then it's just plain unstable again.
...or you go to run anything CUDA based and suddenly you're getting computation errors all over the place.
...or
If it's not 100% stable in everything, it's not stable. Just because it doesn't crash most of the time doesn't mean that it won't one day just crash right in the middle of something epic.
I'd just run it at 850 and be happy in the knowledge that my card was rock solid in anything I wanted to throw at it.
I can't currently clock my Gigabyte 460 over 750 without artifacts appearing in ATI Tool.
Are the gigabyte 460 totally silent, at least when idle?