I can't claim to have read all of your posts but I gather that in your time you have had undiagnosed extreme bilateral hydronephrosis which apparently left you within a week or two of dying; you are an asthmatic and have recently suffered a deep lung infection and now fear that you may now be suffering transient ischemic attacks. You certainly sound like a very unhealthy individual.
I never mentioned TIA, that was someone else. I certainly am very unhealthy, worst luck. A lot of it down to the fact my doctors left me so long for so much damage to occur internally. The fact is, and my surgeon agrees, no doctor in their right mind treats a child for repeated kidney infections for ten years, with increasing severity and pain with associated illness, and fails to do a single investigation. When you have a child presenting those symptoms (real, palpable symptoms) it doesn't make sense to (1) prescribe antibiotics for the repeated UTI and (2) then tell them they're a hypochondriac for complaining it hurts.
My surgeon said I should have been referred for tests ten years earlier, for example ultrasound, IVP, gamma camera, etc, after the second or third infection as they're very uncommon in boys. Such repeated issues should have clearly rung alarm bells. As it is, they didn't and so the condition developed to such an extreme my kidney was on the verge of not only failing but bursting. An eight hour pyeloplasty (and eight smaller surgeries) later, I'm left with life-long damage. If my GPs had sent me for the appropriate tests ten years earlier, I'd have needed a tiny op to correct the pelvic urinary junction obstruction and would have been none the worse for wear.
Instead, my GPs decided to simultaneously treat the UTIs AND tell me it was in my head (even though they agreed I had protein and blood in my urine from the dipstick tests). If I hadn't changed GP by chance due to a house move, I'd have been dead before I hit 13.
Medicine isn't binary I agree. But there's still the ability to recognise the blinding obvious.
When I switched GPs I didn't even have time to fully explain my complaint before she (the new one) had read my notes and said she wanted me in hospital. My surgeon nearly had a fit when he saw my scans and heard how long I'd been complaining of renal issues to the original GPs. So no, it's not clear cut. But to say that's anything but negligence is silly.
EDIT: Having had a moment to re-read your post stockhausen, I think I'd be better to add a postscript here to clear this issue once and for all. You said that the whole 'anxiety/hypochondriac' label was a matter of judgement for the doctor involved. Unfortunately in my case that's a bit of a straw man. I had a real medical condition, as demonstrated by my later diagnosis and surgery. The original GPs said I
didn't have a physical condition and that my ongoing severe pain and nausea was me being a hypochondriac. Since their "anxious, drug seeking hypochondriac" statements were based on their inability to diagnose bilateral hydronephrosis, and their refusal to do any investigations before deciding to label me a hypochondriac (when it turns out I really was literally dying), surely you see why I'm 'annoyed' that their actions still affect me today both in my health and in the way I'm treated by doctors?
When the useless so-and-so finally referred her to a dermatologist they went absolutely mental when they found out how long he had kept her on this stuff. Should she have said something? Changed doctors? Maybe....but she's quite elderly, didn't know the dangers of steroid cream over-use, and frankly trusted that her doctor knew what he was doing.
