• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Radion HD 6870 Benchmark At Guru3d

Soldato
Joined
19 Jun 2004
Posts
6,521
Location
n/east-the toon
Hi, just noticed these at Guru3d > 6870 Benchmarks, so did a benchmark of Heaven 2.1 same setting's as th 6870. My results as follows with a mild OC of my 470 > 650 / 1300/ 1674 to compare against the 6870 Heaven result's. So come everyone whether ATI or NVIDIA let's do a few comparision benchmark's.:)

Guru3d - http://www.guru3d.com/news.html#12051

6870 -
guru3d.png


470 > 675/1300/1674 -

unih.png
 
I'd have the 470.

lol, so between two benchies where the 6870 supposedly had a 10fps higher minimum, a 30% higher score, a higher average you'd choose the Nvidia card? Fanboy much.

Fake anyway, clearly photoshopped, and not very well, but why you'd look at those two results and choose the one with noticeable worse performance, meh.
 
lol, so between two benchies where the 6870 supposedly had a 10fps higher minimum, a 30% higher score, a higher average you'd choose the Nvidia card? Fanboy much.

Fake anyway, clearly photoshopped, and not very well, but why you'd look at those two results and choose the one with noticeable worse performance, meh.

I own a 5970, but if i was buying now and it was a choice between the two, i would buy based on driver support.
 
Last edited:
Prefers Nvidia and their drivers?

And price. At the moment Nvidia are simply better value and who would have thought that a yr ago? ATI undercut Nvidia to gain market share, and not just for the benefit of the customer. Now they have their market share prices remain high.

The only card which still retains any sort of value in the 5 series is the HD5850, but the 460 is almost on par. To get a decent reference hd5850 you are looking at 210, the cheapo non reference designs are not worth it,
 
And price. At the moment Nvidia are simply better value and who would have thought that a yr ago? ATI undercut Nvidia to gain market share, and not just for the benefit of the customer. Now they have their market share prices remain high.

The only card which still retains any sort of value in the 5 series is the HD5850, but the 460 is almost on par. To get a decent reference hd5850 you are looking at 210, the cheapo non reference designs are not worth it,

This always makes me laugh when I here this...
AMD barely make any money on there GPU's so how exactly are they being 'greedy'? Do you expect them to take a loss and effectively partially pay for your video card?

AMD are supply constrained i.e. if they lower prices they don't gain any market share and simply lose money rather than practically break even.

Nv has lowered prices simply because their products don't sell as well and have inventory build-up so they had no choice but to lower prices, but do you remember the launch prices and how ridiculous they were?.
Also it looks increasingly like the 470 is being priced to clear down the stock so Nv can release the 475 to actually earn a profit and gain more than a pathetic 10% DX11 market share.
 
Id trade that 5970 in and get a couple of 470's before the 6970 hit's as the value of your 5970 will be hit hard.

The value of ATi cards have been hit hard ever since the poor drivers after 10.5 tbh.
 
I'd have the 470.

And price. At the moment Nvidia are simply better value and who would have thought that a yr ago? ATI undercut Nvidia to gain market share, and not just for the benefit of the customer. Now they have their market share prices remain high.

The only card which still retains any sort of value in the 5 series is the HD5850, but the 460 is almost on par. To get a decent reference hd5850 you are looking at 210, the cheapo non reference designs are not worth it,

The difference is, the 5850 isn't being priced to sell out, the 470gtx is EOL and is priced to clear all stock so the 475gtx can launch, even then its basically 5850 performance for a little more(not much these days). AMD make a slim profit on a 5850, Nvidia is making a catastrophic loss on a 470gtx at £220, so AMD should slash prices, for no reason, because for a month or two the 470gtx will be sold at a massive loss?

The 5850 price isn't high, the 40nm process price is high, the 470gtx needs to be well over £300 to make ANY profit at all, thats due to neligence and poor design by Nvidia.

If Nvidia stand a chance of not being bankrupt in the future they HAVE TO, with literally no question about it, make a small core gpu, similar to AMD, this will require a VERY different shader being employed, efficient and small and INCREDIBLY hard to program for, so when Nvidia(if they bother) make a vastly more complex shader to make a vastly smaller and more profitable core, expect their drivers to instantly become useless, slow, buggy as hell and trying to get performance out of a complex shader rather than a basic and easy to program for shader.

In a month or more Nvidia will probably have a 475gtx out, basically on par with a 470gtx, and my opinion is they'll price it around £240-250, and it will be worse value than a 5850.

A month after that a 6850 will be out, my guess would be 30-40% faster than a 5850, for around the same price as a current 5850. At which point AMD will be EVEN better value.

AMD have been better value for all but a month in the past 2 years, and this is ONLY because Nvidia are EOL'ing a product, and thats incredibly common in every industry in the world, its not competitive, Nvidia lose cash for every 470gtx sold at that price, but its better to lose £100 now, than have to sell them for an extra £50 loss when the 475gtx launches.

I've also repeatedly commented on the 470gtx being a great value card, for now, for odd reasons, its a good choice for end users, but for Nvidia, its the worst card they sell making the biggest loss and most certainly and unquestionably doesn't indicated that Nvidia are better value in any way than AMD.


Just remember, looking at high res the 460gtx is 30% slower than a 5850, yet has a die size over 10% bigger, costs 15% less, and barely makes a profit at all, end user = great, Nvidia = humoungous fail.
 
lol 460 30% slower than a 5850, there's that ATI bias talking again. And who in there right mind would buy a 5850 or 460 to play games at 2560x1600, and it's not even 30% except for maybe L4D, big whoops.


http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/180?vs=164


Some would argue the 460 is massively underclocked, they can easily do 800Mhz on the core, most 5850 cards now are not reference so no volt adjustment limiting overlocks greatly, that combined with nvidia's better gains from overlocking make the 460 a very worthy purchase.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom