But the desire has a far inferior screen, crappy video recording, and weak battery life none of which can be fixed, so it's swings and roundabouts if you ask me.
It isn't far inferior at all, it's just not as good in direct sunlight and doesn't have as good battery saving properties as Super AMOLED.
Yet vs TFT/LCD screens, the Desire's AMOLED is still better at viewing angles, colour representation and battery life.
Super AMOLED in reality, only has better viewing angles - that's the only physical difference you will notice but viewing angles on a phone is a pretty dumb argument because it's a mobile. You can angle it any way you like, it's not like a TV where you might worry about the viewing experience of someone else in the room who's sat at an acute angle to the TV.
Super AMOLED = AMOLED with some refinements, the technology base is pretty much the same, they're not generations of different technology.
Video recording, the faster hardware of the Samsung is useful here and will record at a higher average FPS but video recording isn't even a good selling point for a phone. If your serious about portable recording, you'll be buying a FlipHD recorder, no phone would even come close to this.
I doubt anyone looks at video recording capabilities of a phone, over its multi media, social integration and web browsing features.
Also, good luck recording video's in the dark on the Galaxy.
My Desire battery lasts two days, easily. Based on the fact I'm at 50% battery since 23hrs unplugged, everything auto syncing in the background.