Well they wanted a salary 3x that of a private in the armed forces.
And there were (maybe more now) about 40 applicants for every firefighter's job advertised... so yeah, the pay can't be that bad
Means tested wages against a completely different service in a completely different role. Why? What benefit would that bring? You bang on about how it's terrible they strike putting life in danger so inferior Army personnel with no experience with civil firefighting, but on the other hand suggest that they should be left to go elsewhere and then we should then pay to train new inferior firefighters?
"A spokesman at the Carmarthen Joint Operation Control Centre said retained firefighters - who are not striking - also attended the incident shortly after the RAF personnel.
A number of striking firefighters in the town also crossed their own picket line to try and assist in the rescue."
"In Lancashire striking crews in Skelmersdale left the picket line to attend a chip pan fire.
They were there several minutes before the military arrived in Green Goddesses.
It has now been decided that all stations where FBU members are on strike, will be told of incidents where life is thought to be in danger.
Elsewhere on Friday night, striking firefighters temporarily suspended their action to deal with a serious road accident in Southampton.
Six firefighters from Highton left the picket line in a red engine to deal with a head-on collision between two cars in Bubb Lane, West End."
"Striking firefighters left their picket lines to help the military crews who attended the blaze, which is being treated as suspicious."
After having a quick scan of those links and quoting some extracts, I can't see where you're coming from in calling them criminals. Would the lives of people been killed been saved by the fire service not being on strike? You cannot possibly know. But people die all the time in fires even when they're not on strike - which has happened twice in the entire history of the fire service?