Are you comparing equally priced (and more importantly equal performance ) products?
Somewhat, yes and no. You're never going to get an equal performance because electronic products evolve no?
I meant in general, and the phone thing especially has stuck in my mind. Most phones these days don't appear to have that good build quality, or will not last as long as the older 'bricks' that used to be owned a good few years ago. It's more common these days for people to damage their phones and need a replacement, years ago you only needed to do that if you lost it or somehow unleashed hell. True - of course the specs are nowhere near the same, but I wasn't talking about that, build quality only.
Another type would be flatscreen televisions - again, even by looks alone these appear flimsier and poorly built compared to the rock solid boxes of CRTs.
My parents spent £200 in the early 80s for their Hitachi microwave, and that lasted without issue until 2009. They spent the same amount on a new one, and by looks, feel, weight etc. it still doesn't give the impression it will last as long.
I had a Ricoh (?) MP3 player that I put through sheer hell. My iPod, Sony NWZ A818 player have all been mollycoddled in protective cases etc., just because they're that much thinner and 'breakable'.
It's true that later products look better (sometimes), and there is deffo a market for attractive goods. Whenever I go to an electronics store the impression I'm left with is how flimsy they are; build quality's probably been sacrificed a little bit.
Who knows, maybe it is a clever ploy to get us to replace our goods quicker.
