Handyman jailed for planting child porn on boss's computer

Von Smallhausen said:
12 years.

Incentive to others who are thinking of a similar scheme to think again.

While he may not actually be a paedophile, he will be looked down as one when jailed.
Click to expand...

Well that guy is an amateur, what he should have done is allow the police to find the images themselves. The question then becomes how the target will get caught when the person framing them is unable to report him (even anonymously).

Anyway it is pretty funny.
 
platinum87 said:
Well that guy is an amateur, what he should have done is allow the police to find the images themselves. The question then becomes how the target will get caught when the person framing them is unable to report him (even anonymously).
Click to expand...

Unfortunately not everyone can be as amazing as you.

platinum87 said:
Anyway it is pretty funny.
Click to expand...

Hysterical. :confused:

fishfingers.jpg
 
platinum87 said:
Well that guy is an amateur, what he should have done is allow the police to find the images themselves. The question then becomes how the target will get caught when the person framing them is unable to report him (even anonymously).

Anyway it is pretty funny.
Click to expand...

Well the police are useless, bullies, corrupt etc so no surprise there.
 
Imo its a rather harsh punishment. Obviously peedos are sick people etc. But 12years in jail for having pictures off child porn is in my mind extreme. It's not like you've killed a person and might not do it ever again. The peedos will most likely still have pictures once they get out of jail eventually. Of course if it also involves rape well then hell they do deserve a long time in jail.
 
oli356 said:
Imo its a rather harsh punishment. Obviously peedos are sick people etc. But 12years in jail for having pictures off child porn is in my mind extreme. It's not like you've killed a person and might not do it ever again. The peedos will most likely still have pictures once they get out of jail eventually. Of course if it also involves rape well then hell they do deserve a long time in jail.
Click to expand...

He was jailed for that long for perverting the course of justice...
 
Rainmaker said:
Yet before your ninja edit you were accusing me of hotlinking to my own website? LOLpratinum87.
Click to expand...

Actually i wrote what you see now first, then went to hotlink, then realised my mistake. Either way you seem to be refreshing pretty dam quick :eek:

Von Smallhausen said:
Well the police are useless, bullies, corrupt etc so no surprise there.
Click to expand...

I didnt say that, i said he was useless, to not be able to complete a simple task like that, and IMO 12 years is what he deserves purely for being caught.
 
UK laws are among the most inconsistent I've ever seen, nothing surprises me any more. The extreme pornography laws are even worse, illegal to posses the images but the act itself is completely legal, so in effect it encourages people to do these things. The worse the action is the lighter the sentence.

legalsystem.gif
 
Last edited:
Energize said:
UK laws are among the most inconsistent I've ever seen, nothing surprises me any more. The extreme pornography laws are even worse, illegal to posses the images but the act itself is completely legal, so in effect it encourages people to do these things. The worse the action is the lighter the sentence.
Click to expand...

Indeed...it baffles the mind :(
 
Energize said:
silly graph
Click to expand...



A lovely (unaccredited) graph undermined by a couple of things:


1) The sentence for murder is life. Always. The earliest you are likely to get out is about ten years, unless absolutely exceptional circumstances apply (usually domestic violence cases striking back, or other cases involving severe provocation), AND you aren't actually free, but on licence. Shop-lift a pack of sweets and it's another couple of years inside at the very least.

2) Could you please point me to three fraud cases where anyone got more then eight years as their sentence?


M
 
Meridian said:
A lovely (unaccredited) graph undermined by a couple of things:


1) The sentence for murder is life. Always. The earliest you are likely to get out is about ten years, unless absolutely exceptional circumstances apply (usually domestic violence cases striking back, or other cases involving severe provocation), AND you aren't actually free, but on licence. Shop-lift a pack of sweets and it's another couple of years inside at the very least.
Click to expand...


The problem is that murder is often not classed as murder, but manslaughter, such as the recent murders where a woman stabbed a man while another taunted his family on the phone, and where two chavs punched a man on the street killing him, getting 3-5 years each.


2) Could you please point me to three fraud cases where anyone got more then eight years as their sentence?

M
Click to expand...

http://www.sfo.gov.uk/press-room/la...-2010/ponzi-schemer-jailed-for-ten-years.aspx

http://www.sfo.gov.uk/press-room/la...virendra-rastogi-to-pay-back-£30-million.aspx

http://news.in.msn.com/international/article.aspx?cp-documentid=4384008

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-st...tax-fraud-land-10-more-years-115875-22569382/
 
Energize said:
The problem is that murder is often not classed as murder, but manslaughter
Click to expand...



Then that would make it not murder then, wouldn't it? The graph you quoted said "murder" not "killing someone". If I drop a piece of litter and someone slips on it and falls and dies, I killed them. But it's not murder.



M
 
Meridian said:
Then that would make it not murder then, wouldn't it? The graph you quoted said "murder" not "killing someone". If I drop a piece of litter and someone slips on it and falls and dies, I killed them. But it's not murder.
Click to expand...

No, killing someone by purposefully attacking them without provocation is murder regardless of what the courts classify it as.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom