This is a bit of a thread derail, but it is following another derail so I guess that makes it better.
Alternatively you may interpret it as making it worse.
I think that the OCZ Gold range has become a bit of an OcUK phenomenon. It was actually something I selected when starting to plan my new build; based on timings, price and so forth it seemed like a fantastic deal. Just asking on these forums made me decide against it. Several people pointed out the flaws that apparently were inherent in at least one batch of these sticks.
Now, the interesting thing is that this started with what was supposedly a faulty batch from OCZ. I did not investigate this further, the recommendations found here coupled with the fact that the G.Skill RAM went on sale meant that it was an easy choice to go for those when time came to order. However, I feel like the advising of staying clear of these have become perhaps not a myth, but par for the course here. I still have no idea whether you should stay clear of them, but just about anyone who posts here will be told that one should opt for other makes.
Now, I think Liampope makes a valid point. Furthermore, there are alternatives that are competitive price wise. Thus the question is, even if it has become a bit of a myth, why should you take the chance? And also, word of mouth should not be discounted, however you should be aware of the fact that sometimes these things take on lives of their own.