So now Al Murray is better than Hicks? Sheer bloody nonsense in my opinion, but hey, different people like different things.
Theres so much snobbery around comedy and around what should and shouldnt be regarded as good. Its why michael mcintyre has got sluch a slating by the comics on the curcuit. The public love him which is why he's made more than any other comedian last year, but the comedians all think he's crap and shouldnt be doing comedy because his stuff isnt well written.
Hang on a minute, if he's more popular than the rest of you, who are you to say he shoudlnt be doing comedy ? just because he didnt get into it the same way and doesnt write what you consider to be "excellent" material.
I've got a lot of respect for murray, unlike Mcyintyre he's been on the curcuit for ages and spent many years just trying to make it. Too many people think of him as the pub landlord character. He's the son of a Lieutenant Colonel and the grandson of a diplomat. He studied history at oxford and his road to berlin series showed a completely different side to him. He's fluent in german and french and the character was and still is in my mind genius.
His biggest problem is that he's never done anything new since creating the landlord. 15 years on the character hasnt changed and neither have the gags. Yes you can write his sketch yourself but that doesnt stop him being funny.
People argue that hicks is somehow better than other comics because his material focus' on philosophical issues and challenging the audience on the "accepted truth"
But imo this is just comic snobbery. They are after all just stand up comics. Who are there to make you laugh.
Who are the comic snobs to determine what we should, and shouldnt be allowed to find funny ?