Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 16,168
- Location
- Neptune
I was having a browse on IMDB (like you do) and noticed this:
Inception. Estimated budget: £160,000,000
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1375666/business
How to Train Your Dragon. Estimated budget: £165,000,000
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0892769/business
Now, is this a mistake/bad estimate, or does a fully CGI film cost more to make than one that is part CGI, part live action?
Considering the salaries of the actors in Inception, vs those used in 'Dragon...I'm not sure how it all adds up.
The CGI in both films are exceptional ('Dragon, for a animated cartoon, is especially good).
Inception. Estimated budget: £160,000,000
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1375666/business
How to Train Your Dragon. Estimated budget: £165,000,000
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0892769/business
Now, is this a mistake/bad estimate, or does a fully CGI film cost more to make than one that is part CGI, part live action?
Considering the salaries of the actors in Inception, vs those used in 'Dragon...I'm not sure how it all adds up.
The CGI in both films are exceptional ('Dragon, for a animated cartoon, is especially good).