3d bench mark, mine and yours?

buzzlightweight · 9 Oct 2010 at 23:38

just did a 3d bench mark on my rig and scored 47008.

is that any good????

what benches have you scored?

chaotic_uk · 9 Oct 2010 at 23:45

would be an idea to say which benchmark , also your specs

buzzlightweight · 9 Oct 2010 at 23:49

sorry dude.

[email protected]
asus p5q deluxe
6 gigs ddr2 ram
ati 5870

it was a 3dmark test

http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=320

buzzlightweight · 10 Oct 2010 at 01:28

chaotic_uk said:
would be an idea to say which benchmark , also your specs

it was on graphics!! whoops my bad

buzzlightweight · 10 Oct 2010 at 13:09

so........ is that 3d bench matk any good?

Devrij · 10 Oct 2010 at 13:26

lols, you might want to try 3dmark vantage for something a bit more current. Or unigine heaven, for dx11 performance... or cinebench for cpu performance.... anything really that isn't from 2001.

bifday2k · 10 Oct 2010 at 13:34

Agreed with above, but for comparasion my rig in my sig below scores 54k, if i remember rightly that benchmark is very cpu dependent as well, cant really remember not used it for so long.

But its better to use newer bench mark software really, or ideally run proper games with fraps installed so you can see ingame frames per second.

buzzlightweight · 10 Oct 2010 at 13:49

bifday2k said:
Agreed with above, but for comparasion my rig in my sig below scores 54k, if i remember rightly that benchmark is very cpu dependent as well, cant really remember not used it for so long.

But its better to use newer bench mark software really, or ideally run proper games with fraps installed so you can see ingame frames per second.

ok will do, thanks for the response

buzzlightweight · 10 Oct 2010 at 13:51

bifday2k said:
Agreed with above, but for comparasion my rig in my sig below scores 54k, if i remember rightly that benchmark is very cpu dependent as well, cant really remember not used it for so long.

But its better to use newer bench mark software really, or ideally run proper games with fraps installed so you can see ingame frames per second.

where can i get fraps from? :confused:

bifday2k · 10 Oct 2010 at 13:54

From here http://www.fraps.com/

Devrij · 11 Oct 2010 at 00:38

Just for reference, here's mine.
E8400 @4.25GHz
P5Q Deluxe
XFX 5850 @870/1200

Surprising as your CPU and GPU should top mine. Looks like it's more dependant on clockspeed than multicore power

redshadows · 11 Oct 2010 at 01:08

buzzlightweight said:
just did a 3d bench mark on my rig and scored 47008.

is that any good????

what benches have you scored?
[email protected]
asus p5q deluxe
6 gigs ddr2 ram
ati 5870

VS

Devrij said:
Just for reference, here's mine.
E8400 @4.25GHz
P5Q Deluxe
XFX 5850 @870/1200

Surprising as your CPU and GPU should top mine. Looks like it's more dependant on clockspeed than multicore power

OWNED

Only joking, Im quite surprised at the score.

Im not putting mine up I get owned by budget laptops nowadays.

redshadows · 11 Oct 2010 at 01:09

Sorry Double post

ThomasTheTankEngine · 11 Oct 2010 at 20:19

redshadows said:
VS

OWNED

Only joking, Im quite surprised at the score.

Im not putting mine up I get owned by budget laptops nowadays.

3dmark 2001 is so old it's pretty much irrelevant to modern hardware. You can get all sorts of wacky results with it if you're using current hardware.

buzzlightweight · 11 Oct 2010 at 22:40

Devrij said:
Just for reference, here's mine.
E8400 @4.25GHz
P5Q Deluxe
XFX 5850 @870/1200

Surprising as your CPU and GPU should top mine. Looks like it's more dependant on clockspeed than multicore power

i was owned and i re did the 2006 3d mark and got 30000 odd!

much work to do me thinks!

coupe69 · 11 Oct 2010 at 23:08

buzzlightweight said:
i was owned and i re did the 2006 3d mark and got 30000 odd!

much work to do me thinks!

30,000 odd? We need screenshots with exact scores

Devrij · 11 Oct 2010 at 23:19

buzzlightweight said:
i was owned and i re did the 2006 3d mark and got 30000 odd!

much work to do me thinks!

Try vantage mate, it's the most current of the 3dmark graphics suite and will provide more relevant results, and you'll almost certainly pwn my score (unless you're running box-stock and even then). The scores don't relate to eachother between benchmarks, so later versions will usually give you lower scores (being more demanding). If it makes you feel better, my 3dmark06 score is only 19882

My cpu lets me down quite a bit in later benchies.

1Day · 12 Oct 2010 at 11:08

If you got 30 K odd in 3Dmark06 your system kicks big time butt.

Vantage will give you a good sense of where you are in the overall pecking order of things.

buzzlightweight · 12 Oct 2010 at 12:18

Devrij said:
Try vantage mate, it's the most current of the 3dmark graphics suite and will provide more relevant results, and you'll almost certainly pwn my score (unless you're running box-stock and even then). The scores don't relate to eachother between benchmarks, so later versions will usually give you lower scores (being more demanding). If it makes you feel better, my 3dmark06 score is only 19882 My cpu lets me down quite a bit in later benchies.

1Day said:
If you got 30 K odd in 3Dmark06 your system kicks big time butt.

Vantage will give you a good sense of where you are in the overall pecking order of things.

im not in it for the bragging rights, i just want a system that can handle demanding games.

i will give it a go thou!

bifday2k · 12 Oct 2010 at 12:32

You graphics card will handle any current game so no worries there, you have a quad core, clocked past 3ghz, so again no problems there.

Don't worry about gaming benchmarks, load up real games and enjoy them. The benchmarks have no real world use apart from world record attempts and bragging rights.

Spend your time enjoying gaming is what i say.