Are they calling it a 6770 now, thank the lord they did not go down the other path!
True, calling it a GTX460 wouldn't help.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Are they calling it a 6770 now, thank the lord they did not go down the other path!
Are they calling it a 6770 now, thank the lord they did not go down the other path!
True, calling it a GTX460 wouldn't help.
Still gong down the other path, the 6870 will perform similar to a 5870, the 6770 will not be based on the new cores but instead be a 5770 re branded to a 6770, like Nvidia with the 8800GT-9800GT.

You have lost me

Nah you're not confused, AMD are re branding the 5770 as the 6770, only difference is they will come with higher clocks.
Sorry siily gag, I was suggesting the other naming route was to use Nvidia names.![]()

6870 is going after the 460 1GB, so expect a price tag of around £180-200
6870 is going after the 460 1GB, so expect a price tag of around £180-200
Well I was basing that on being around GTX460 performance levels, if it really performs like a full fledged HD5870, then I expect it to cost around the same £170-£180.
This all depends on prices.
For example if they shift the 6770 down into current high end price 5670 terratory, the 6870 into highend 5770 terratory and then have the 6970 sitting where the 5870 is now then that would be very fair.
On the other hand if they keep the £ per FPS the same or worse then it's just going to be a joke.
Still gong down the other path, the 6870 will perform similar to a 5870, the 6770 will not be based on the new cores but instead be a 5770 re branded to a 6770, like Nvidia with the 8800GT-9800GT.
That makes no sense to me. AMD are meant to have this brand new hybrid architecture which gives more performance per mm2 of silicon then the previous generation of products. What's the point in spending money on developing chips if you not going to use it on a new mid range which will be cheaper for them to produce?