as some of you know i have an ongoing claim going after some berk drove into my vectra.
now after lots of to-ing and fro-ing the other parties insurer admitted 100% liability with my solicitors yesterday. so all well, or so it seemed
i spent all morning today trying to explain to my solicitors that i will end up out of pocket for increased insurance for the next few years, they seemed somewhat confused by this until i managed to speak to a partner in the firm, both claim handler and claims manager didnt have a clue it seems as they both were insisting i would never see a rise and it must be due to my claim still being active on the motor insurance database. I eventually managed to convince them by running 2 quotes and e-mailing the difference off using a completely fake name in a random address to illustrate my point.
anyways. the partner has advised that i have no hope in hell of claiming increased premiums back as a non insured loss unless i can prove an actual loss. IE i need to be able to offer written proof from the insurance company that my premium would be £xxx cheaper if i hadnt been involved in a claim as quotes from online wouldnt stand up in court it seems
now with no renewal due for the Taxi for at least 7 months and Adrian flux adopting the sensible opinion that a NON FAULT claim will not increase a premium i'm at a loss as of how to demonstrate this. and how the sky van driving pleb has suddendly jacked up the cost of my impending mid life crisis and s2000 ownership plans
my argument would be quotes from online sites showing that the cheapest quote i can obtain on a s2000 today would be £350 more with a non fault claim listed. but seemingly this is unnaceptable. Can anyone suggest a way to prove that i will be bum raped by insurance companies that would be accepted in court?
as far as i can see i'm getting screwed as follows
stigma of being classed a less safe driver by certain companies
reduced choice of insurers(some refuse to quote)
and obviously dearer prices with certain(namely cheapest) insurance firms
help please guys
now after lots of to-ing and fro-ing the other parties insurer admitted 100% liability with my solicitors yesterday. so all well, or so it seemed
i spent all morning today trying to explain to my solicitors that i will end up out of pocket for increased insurance for the next few years, they seemed somewhat confused by this until i managed to speak to a partner in the firm, both claim handler and claims manager didnt have a clue it seems as they both were insisting i would never see a rise and it must be due to my claim still being active on the motor insurance database. I eventually managed to convince them by running 2 quotes and e-mailing the difference off using a completely fake name in a random address to illustrate my point.
anyways. the partner has advised that i have no hope in hell of claiming increased premiums back as a non insured loss unless i can prove an actual loss. IE i need to be able to offer written proof from the insurance company that my premium would be £xxx cheaper if i hadnt been involved in a claim as quotes from online wouldnt stand up in court it seems
now with no renewal due for the Taxi for at least 7 months and Adrian flux adopting the sensible opinion that a NON FAULT claim will not increase a premium i'm at a loss as of how to demonstrate this. and how the sky van driving pleb has suddendly jacked up the cost of my impending mid life crisis and s2000 ownership plans
my argument would be quotes from online sites showing that the cheapest quote i can obtain on a s2000 today would be £350 more with a non fault claim listed. but seemingly this is unnaceptable. Can anyone suggest a way to prove that i will be bum raped by insurance companies that would be accepted in court?
as far as i can see i'm getting screwed as follows
stigma of being classed a less safe driver by certain companies
reduced choice of insurers(some refuse to quote)
and obviously dearer prices with certain(namely cheapest) insurance firms
help please guys