Not having a go at anyone here, but the following quotes touched on something I think most ordinary people have a great deal of trouble getting their head round:
No, we just have the common sense to realise that it's our fault as well.
Not my fault; had a job and no debt until the recession. Had savings too -
had being the operative word here - spent it all to make ends meet.
All strikes do is make things worse for everyone. What's the point? We squandered money and now we have to make cuts. It's not much fun, no one likes it and striking about it wont make one sodding bit of difference.
Sorry, but what's all of this 'we' business? Unless you're a labour MP or a banker, 'we' had FA do do with most of the financial trouble.
There's a deep well of ire yet to be plumbed when politicians and the like start harping on about how 'we're all in it together' - the implication is that there's some kind of shared responsibility and therefore, accountability and obligation.
I don't recall being asked about any of the issues and decisions made on fiscal policy (yes I know

). But after making decisions of our behalf, then stuffing it up so badly, it's a trifle galling to only now be invited to the party when the cheque needs signing.
The reality is that most (if not all) politicians currently see voters as batteries for the economy.
Personally I find it rankles to the highest degree to have everything I have worked for in the last 10 years get sucked up into something that had nothing to do with the way I earned and spent/saved my money. The longer term ramifications put added pressure to my personal life, causing an already difficult situation to collapse into ruin.
It's not just the economy that is ******, it's peoples lives that have suffered as a result of avaricious banking practices and weak spined politicians, both of whom seem to think growth and exponential profit are the only way forward.
Whatever happened to sustainability?
Would striking help? Most likely not. But I do think the folk who run this country need a timely reminder that they have to answer to
us. Making decisions about austerity is all very well and good from a position where the effects have no real meaning.
There's nothing like torches and pitchforks and an angry mob to bring into focus the duty of our elected leaders and how out of touch they are. They have proved that they are not to be trusted with the job of governance, time and again, with lies and corruption at every level of policy and law, yet they cannot see the conflict of interest in voting on your own pay and expenses - such things deemed to be a right, nay a
privilege not sanctioned for you lesser mortals.
The whole business sickens me. Voting is out as a way to elicit change - one politician/party is much the same as another - so something else has to give. Trouble is they're not afraid of being crass and specious in office; perhaps a dose of civil unrest would convince westminster to take us seriously for a change.
