29 Oct 2010 at 17:08 #21 anything I don't mind anything I don't mind Permabanned OP Joined 28 Dec 2009 Posts 13,052 Location london locking phones is pointless, such a scam.
29 Oct 2010 at 17:13 #22 MiNxYyY MiNxYyY Permabanned Joined 22 Mar 2008 Posts 3,977 Location Redditch groen said: locking phones is pointless, such a scam. Click to expand... Not really though is it. If you lose your phone and someone finds it but has the wrong sim, they cant then use the phone until they get it unlocked.
groen said: locking phones is pointless, such a scam. Click to expand... Not really though is it. If you lose your phone and someone finds it but has the wrong sim, they cant then use the phone until they get it unlocked.
29 Oct 2010 at 17:29 #23 MikeHunt79 MikeHunt79 Soldato Joined 4 Jan 2004 Posts 20,802 Location ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ groen said: locking phones is pointless, such a scam. Click to expand... I'm surprised phone locking is allowed myself, it could be considered anti-competitive IMO.
groen said: locking phones is pointless, such a scam. Click to expand... I'm surprised phone locking is allowed myself, it could be considered anti-competitive IMO.
29 Oct 2010 at 17:42 #24 anything I don't mind anything I don't mind Permabanned OP Joined 28 Dec 2009 Posts 13,052 Location london It is pointless because you can just spend £10 and get it unlocked. Trying to sell network lock as a security feature is laughable.
It is pointless because you can just spend £10 and get it unlocked. Trying to sell network lock as a security feature is laughable.
29 Oct 2010 at 17:59 #25 DIABLO DIABLO Soldato Joined 18 Oct 2002 Posts 6,357 Location N.Devon Hardly the operator's fault if you did'nt read the contract you were signing and incured unexspected charges.
Hardly the operator's fault if you did'nt read the contract you were signing and incured unexspected charges.