Soldato
- Joined
- 20 Jun 2010
- Posts
- 3,251
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-11650593
Communications Act 2003? Good olde Labour
Here we go, the blasted act itself:
He was charged under the Communications Act 2003, for sending malicious communications that were grossly offensive.
Communications Act 2003? Good olde Labour

Here we go, the blasted act itself:
127
Improper use of public electronic communications network
(1)
A person is guilty of an offence if he—
(a)
sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; or
(b)
causes any such message or matter to be so sent.
(2)
A person is guilty of an offence if, for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another, he—
(a)
sends by means of a public electronic communications network, a message that he knows to be false,
(b)
causes such a message to be sent; or
(c)
persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network.
(3)
A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or to both.
(4)
Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply to anything done in the course of providing a programme service (within the meaning of the Broadcasting Act 1990 (c. 42)).
Last edited: