Officer 'Inserted Song Titles During Inquest'

Soldato
Joined
30 Sep 2009
Posts
3,626
A police marksman is under investigation for allegedly inserting song titles into his evidence during lawyer Mark Saunders' inquest.


The Met CO19 firearms officer, referred to only as AZ8, reportedly dropped in the lyric references as part of a shared joke with colleagues.

He was later "reprimanded" by a senior officer in his unit when evidence of his actions emerged.

But police watchdog, the Independent Police Complaints Commission, has now been called in after the matter came to the attention of more senior staff.

Officer AZ8 was one of two specialist firearms officers who could have shot the fatal bullet to Mr Saunders' head, the inquest heard.

He told the hearing at Westminster Coroner's Court on September 27 that he regretted not shooting Mr Saunders earlier.

He added: "When he brought it down the first time I was virtually at that point.

"I took my breath, checked my sight picture and was just about squeezing one off.

"I was waiting for it, then he brought it back up. I took a lung full of air again and eased off on the trigger.

"As it came down again it crossed my line and I let off the first round."

He continued: " I thought that 'enough is enough'.

"It just got past that point of no return. Like you say, I have seen the film, and I am kicking myself because I feel I left it too late."

The songs allegedly referred to are believed to be:

:: First Time by Robyn Beck

:: Enough Is Enough by Donna Summer

:: At That Point by Teairra Marí

:: Point Of No Return by Immortal Technique

An IPCC spokeswoman said: "It is alleged that, while giving evidence under oath to the inquest on September 27, officer AZ8 deliberately inserted song titles into his verbal testimony."

"The investigation will examine the officer's testimony, any impact that testimony may have had on the proceedings, the way in which the allegation was initially dealt with by one of his supervisors, and whether or not any other police officers were involved."

A spokesman for the Met said: "We have now been informed by the IPCC that they will manage an investigation by the Metropolitan Police Directorate of Professional Standards.

"The Met takes this matter extremely seriously as we expect the highest standards of all of our staff. The officer has been removed from operational firearms duty."


Nice to see them taking this so seriously. Of course, there could be nothing in it other than pure coincidence :rolleyes:
 
And IPPC spokesman today said **** the po-leece, strongly denying any reference to 80s rap star Flavour Flave.

On a more serious note, this is not a matter for the IPCC in my humble opinion. It is a matter than can be dealt with and investigated internally.
 
I don't understand what the problem is. As long as what he said made sense and wasn't mocking anyone where is the issue?

Waste of public money for silly inquests methinks.
 
Can he be held in contempt of court in an inquest like this?

Because that's basically what this is, if accurate.

In related news, in my last job I had a client called Valerie. I once had to arrange a meeting with her, so I called up and explained the situation and said "Why don't I come on over, Valerie?". WIN.
 
Am I the only one who thinks "so?...".

As long as his testimony was factual and truthful, who cares how he got his point across?
 
RAP FAIL !

Although I despised it in my youth, despise it now and don't envisage that changing.

It's ok, I thought I was cool and 'with it' because I listened to a load of anrgy black men talking about how badass they were and how they hated the pigs.

Wish I'd put more thought into my youth, tbh.
 
Hating the police is not cool young man.

* wags finger *

;)

Sorry for the o/t but people like Tupac Shakur and Snoop had or have anti-police sentiments and gang affiliations but seemed to happily play cops and informants when dollars were waved under their noses. Strange that.

Anyway, o/t over.
 
Or it's just a big coincidence. IPCC: "Ooh yerr never thrort of thaat"

You think someone is reading court transcripts looking for any words that happen to be song lyrics?

Or do you think that they heard it from the senior staff who, according to the article, have some evidence of it being an in-joke?
 
I am well aware of the Rodney King case and found the LAPD's actions deplorable then as I do now.

It still doesn't change the fact that I don't like rap as in me, personally and it has nothing to do with police, colour or social problems in the USA and beyond. It does nothing for me and never has.

If it floats the boat of others then all well and good. I certainly wouldn't try to change their minds.
 
You think someone is reading court transcripts looking for any words that happen to be song lyrics?

Or do you think that they heard it from the senior staff who, according to the article, have some evidence of it being an in-joke?

Could be either, just voicing my opinion.

Like with Dickens novels or Queen lyrics, sometimes people just look for things that aren't there. I'm not saying that is necessarily the case here but it is possible none the less.

Re: in-joke; maybe someone voiced up against this officer after the allegations were made because they had a personal vendetta?
 
Back
Top Bottom