Vigilante launching paedophile naming website

Rozzy85 said:
While Paedophilia is an atrocious crime, it seems bizarre it causes more of an stur up than someone who has killed someone which would surely be the worst of the crimes? I haven't seen anyone do a list of 'People who kill' yet (although I'm sure an Internet Warrior will prove me wrong with that).

Either way I see this going wrong with innocent people being accused incorrectly.
Click to expand...

Being abused and having to live with it mentally scared for the rest of your life is a lot worst then just being killed! ;)

I guess it's just how people look on the way of crime. One would abuse the abuser!
 
Good old lynch mob mentality.

Throughout history and modern times it has consistently been the main refuse of the feeble minded.

Glad to see our thuggish friend there hasn't tried to move things on.

Anger and fear are such base emotions, it's a real shame these people aren't taught how to analyse them correctly, instead they just lash out (in this case metaphorically using a website).
 
manic_man said:
Anger and fear are such base emotions, it's a real shame these people aren't taught how to analyse them correctly, instead they just lash out (in this case metaphorically using a website).
Click to expand...

I'm sure he'll leave the physical lashing out to someone else.
 
manic_man said:
Anger and fear are such base emotions, it's a real shame these people aren't taught how to analyse them correctly, instead they just lash out (in this case metaphorically using a website).
Click to expand...

Yeah i see your point entirely..i think we should tell that to all little children who have been gangraped on almost daily occasion for years on end.

"look sweetheart, dont be angry at your stepdad because he had fun with you with his friends since you were 6y.old until your 14y.old, it's such a base emotion to be angry or afraid, forgive and forget right love?"

Anger and fear are perfectly acceptable emotions to such actions perpetrated on someone. While I don't condone the move to set up a website I can't find any shred of common sense in what you said. I guess I'm just a pleb and simple minded though so don't bother with me.
 
Mr Jack said:
And you will, of course, have an evidential basis for that claim, yes?
Click to expand...

Let's see, have you known many heterosexuals or homosexuals who suddenly "changed" preferences after any given amount of time? What? No? there's your answer.

If you like little children you are not going to change simply because you were put in a jail or because someone tried to brainwash you while in there. It's instict, it won't change.

If you are suggesting (and I'm not saying you are, but whoever is) that it does change then what would your answer be to having a convicted child abuser babysit for your young children after spending 20y in jail? If you feel uneasy with this proposition then you are a hypocrite.
 
krooton said:
You do realise that being a paedophile (by definition, someone attracted to prepubescent children) doesn't actually mean that they have or will sexually abuse children, much in the same way that a person attracted to adults will not necessarily rape them.
Click to expand...

Exactly, people assume paedophile = child molester which is simply not the case.

As said before you can get on a sex offenders list for a pile of different reasons so this is a terrible idea
 
let the police do their job. this list is nothing more than an invasion of privacy laws. if they commit the crime then they go to jail and pay their dues (tossing the salad etc...). what next a list of drink drivers, smokers, alcoholics, speeding violations ....

for example a while back i posted an article about a drunk guy who was jumping on his trampoline naked late night/early morning. now he is a sex offender, but does he deserve to be beaten or ostracized by society??

these lists will only lead to violence and won't make the streets more secure in any way
 
Last edited:
Getting caught urinating in the street can get you on the Sexual Offenders List.
It is not a reliable source at all.
 
AcidHell2 said:
There should be no list, it just leads to violence and in nearly all cases on innocent people. they are in jail or have paid their debt.
Click to expand...

This.

stoofa said:
Nobody can defend what these people have done.
There is no defence and thankfully the majority of them will do jail time.

However I'm a great believer in rehabilitation.
Sure people will re-offend, you can't really protect against that.
However some of these people have done their crime, have since done their time and now should be left alone.

This kind of "listing" leads to people who have tried to get their life back on track having to hide.
Many of the times the "dumb" vigilante will attack an innocent person.

I'm against censorship in most cases - but I can only hope this site is closed down before it gets off the ground.
Click to expand...

Exactly.

This **** obviously has nothing better to do with his time. False alegations ruin peoples lives as will mistaken identity. I don't think words can describe how much of a bad idea this is/was.
 
stoofa said:
Getting caught urinating in the street can get you on the Sexual Offenders List.
It is not a reliable source at all.
Click to expand...

Got a source? Afaik the crime of urinating would be dealt with under breach of the peace or public decency, it's not a sex act. If you were running after a group of girls whilst urinating then that may be covered but I think you're coming up with sensationalist headlines.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom